while both countries deny it, the u.s. government believes russia asked china for miitary equipment. this could signal their struggling to keep they are war going and russia missile supplies are running low and it s clear while russia may not be capable of occupying the country of 44 million people who continue to resist and protest the invasion, putin may be singularly focused on regime change in ukraine no matter the cost. so where does this end? francis you may remember from the 1989 essay the end of history argues that russia is heading for an out right defeat in ukraine and that there is no diplomatic solution to the war prior to this happening. tom argues in the atlantic is ensuring putin is defeated whale providing with an out route of the crisis offering ideas that
Transcripts for BBCNEWS HARDtalk 20220322 00:30:30
archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
seen since the cold war. you re saying it s a good thing, but part of the end of history idea was that force would no longer be appropriate or needed and this has shown how wrong that was. well, yes, that s. .. just to be fair, i never said that history was somehow this automatic mechanism that went on despite the actions of, you know, individuals, we still have human agency and i think it s pretty clear that if people don t believe in liberal democracy, if they don t fight for it, if they don t constantly struggle for it, it s not going to happen. and that s, i think, a useful reminder to everybody. ok, so germany spending 2% of gdp on defence is a good thing. it s a good thing, definitely. ..because it s defending liberal democracy. when you talk about what this will all mean for populists, um. nicholas farrell in the spectator writes that, the war puts the raison d etre of most european right wing
but part of the end of history idea was that force would no longer be appropriate or needed and this has shown how wrong that was. well, yes, that s. .. just to be fair, i never said that history was somehow this automatic mechanism that went on despite the actions of, you know, individuals, we still have human agency and i think it s pretty clear that if people don t believe in liberal democracy, if they don t fight for it, if they don t constantly struggle for it, it s not going to happen. and that s, i think, a useful reminder to everybody. ok, so germany spending 2% of gdp on defence is a good thing. it s a good thing, definitely. ..because it s defending liberal democracy when you talk about what this will all mean for populists, um. nicholas farrell in the spectator writes that, the war puts the raison d etre of most european right wing populists, the defence
the solidarity within the nato alliance has really been revived to an extent that we ve really not seen since the cold war. you re saying it s a good thing but part of the end of history idea was that force would no longer be appropriate or needed and this has shown how wrong that was. well, yes, that s. .. just to be fair, i never said that history was somehow this automatic mechanism that went on despite the actions of, you know, individuals, we still have human agency and i think it s pretty clear that if people don t believe in liberal democracy, if they don t fight for it, if they don t constantly struggle for it, it s not going to happen. and that s, i think, a useful reminder to everybody. ok, so germany spending 2% of gdp on defence is a good thing. it s a good thing, definitely. ..because it s defending liberal democracy when you talk about what this will all mean for populists, um. nicholas farrell in
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.