credibility to her allegations that she made them before this other story broke. i would like to say another thing about the district attorney s office. i know steve cooley the elected district attorney of la county. he is a professional very careful and cautious and fair district attorney. he is not going to be rushed whether it s mel gibb on or anybody else. he is going to allow the investigation to be completed. he will hear the presentation made by gibson s attorney to the hair rif and he will consid con what mr. gibson has to say and he will make his decision. fair enough. dillon howard how will radar on-line defend that you have in po he goes tapes in a state where two partys are generally considered necessary for a recording? how did you get it? you don t have to give up your source. just broad strokes. you said yourself california might be a two-party state but in the event there is physical rye lens being threatened
drones flying around, that somehow america will be less safe? i can t prove you wrong, joe. if it were up to me, i would have gone in, knocked over taliban, gone after al qaeda, come home. that s not been strategic to us. never has been. the problem is that karzai, in a way, does have us boxed in in this sense. bo obama is not committing 100,000 troops for karzai. he did it because he believes it is strategically critical not to lose this war. that s why he s pouring them in there. that s why, as chris said, that karzai s got us over a barrel in this sense. he is there. he s, quote, the elected president. we have to deal with him or work around him. there s not a whole lot we can do about him. so he panders to his base in afghanistan by playing the anti-american card, the nationalist card. that s what s going on. and he s got obama in a box because obama believes this is strategically vital.
doing things that were illegal, taking control of the military from civilian elected leaders. and mark milley didn t blush, he confirmed they had done just that. ma am milley told nancy pelosi, i assure you we have checks and balances in the system. yeah, they are written into the constitution, according to the post, some of those checks and balances he referred to involved undermining the elected president s authority to choose the director of the cia. interesting, a lot of focus on the cia tells you what kind of power they have. when the president reportedly considering firing who runs the cia and replacing her in the closing days of his administration we now know that milley pressured the chief of staff not to do that, asked what the hell is going on here? would you guys doing? this is lunacy, not how the government should work. the chief should not be having