yet. i gotcha. but the criticism of you, again, this has nothing to do with your client. it s been the same as mueller. when people say mueller has gone beyond the scope. you re going beyond the scope with this and they don t understand what it has to do with representing an mda. we don t know if we re going beyond the scope yet, because as for the reveals last week, it related to the same bank account at issue, the consultants llc, the same entity that michael cohen formed for the purposes of paying my client the $130,000, and the full story hasn t been told yet as it relates to this. because you don t believe they re revealing the truth, you don t know where any lead might end or where it will take you? is that what you re saying? no, what i m saying is air point is a good one. when you pull a string, you don t necessarily know where it s going to end, but all of this seems to trace back to this llc and the bank account, both
information. you see all the aliases there. stephanie clifford is also known by her stage name stormy daniels. everybody knew that. but she is known by peggy pederson, a pseudonimo she wanted to use in this. look down further when it says plaintiff versus donald j. trump. he had an alias of david dennisonen. the consultants llc, the wall street journal reported earlier that s linked to mr. cohen. what s interesting that mr. cohen is not named as someone in this lawsuit. but he is mentioned quite repeatedly in the lawsuit itself. there are lots of different things. they have mentioned the $130,000 that has been reported that was paid to stormy daniels. the one thing that nobody did know is whether or not donald trump actually signed this agreement. now, these court documents show that he did not sign the
information relating to michael cohen and this administration, and especially as it relates to michael cohen s activities from the date of the campaign up until april or may of this year. we ve become a repository because people trust us with the information they give us. they expect us to, a, vet it and make sure it checks out, and b, to disclose it and keep their confidences. we re going to continue to do that as it relates to information that comes to light, and we haven t been proven wrong yet. i gotcha. but the criticism of you, again, this has nothing to do with your client. it s been the same as mueller. when people say mueller has gone beyond the scope. you re going beyond the scope with this and they don t understand what it has to do with representing an mda. we don t know if we re going beyond the scope yet, because as for the reveals last week, it related to the same bank account at issue, the consultants llc, the same entity that michael
peterson, a pseudonym they wanted to use in this particular thing, an ailius. look down further when it says plaintiff versus donald j. trump. he had an alias of david dennison. the consultants llc, the wall street journal reported earlier that s linked to mr. cohen. what s interesting that mr. cohen is not named as someone in this lawsuit. but he is mentioned quite repeatedly in the lawsuit itself. there are lots of different things. they have mentioned the $130,000 that has been reported that was paid to stormy daniels. the one thing that nobody did know is whether or not donald trump actually signed this agreement. now, these court documents show that he did not sign the non-disclosure agreement. and that gives him potential plausible deniability, saying maybe just his lawyer knew about