attacking precedent, it s undermining the rule of law. sometimes a court gets it wrong. dred scott was a precedent of the supreme court. plessy vs. ferguson which upheld segregation was a precedent of the court. those were both wrong because they deviated from the constitution s core principle that the government cannot take account of its citizens based on their skin color. that doesn t mean you can t take socio-economic class into account, geography into account, educational background into account when you make admissions decisions. but schools and universities are now going to have to be like the rest of the government and not look at your skin color. people can still talk in their personal statements, of course, about their experience when it comes to racism or it comes to heritage. but you mentioned right now how things stand. i mean, there s still you know comparatively speaking a lack of hispanic representation at cal. and as you re well aware after prop 209, there was a gian