definition in the jurisprudence that would directly relate to this case, but remember, in the election of 1876, soon after the 14th amendment, supreme court justices were involved and choosing the president then also, and as a lecture electoral commission was established, including five members of the supreme court, and a disputed presidential election. judges may pretty much very well liked the idea that they can choose the president. they don t get a chance to do that very often. i am not so sure that they are that anxious to have an off ramp, like my colleagues here. i have to squeeze in a final break here. i want to get your answer to that same question on the finding officer and insurrection after this commercial break. we ll be right back. ht back. at each day s staaart. as time went on it was easy to seee.
imposed, trump stands to spend his life in court trying not to pay. the trial ended today in trumpian style which is to say full of ridiculous goofiness and unprofessionalism of both donald trump and his lawyers. donald trump s lawyers did not request a jury trial in the case, but that did not stop them or donald trump from complaining that they weren t getting a jury trial. they specifically did not request. that is as goofy as lawyering gets. the lawyers donald trump paid shows chose not to have a jury trial. for donald trump to complain about not having a jury trial is for donald trump to confess that he is the single stupidest client ever to appear in that courtroom. days ago donald trump claimed that he wanted to present himself the final arguments in this case. the judge in the case went along with that game and imposed, of course, the standard rules for such presentations, the same rules that apply to lawyers and court, which donald trump refused to
c. circuit, the nation s second highest court, just a couple of days ago. i expect that court is going to throw out trump s claims really quickly, and trump has always been hoping united states supreme court will get that case and stopped his trial pending it. i m just not sure that s right. there is so little to trump s claims that it is perfectly plausible to think u.s. supreme court s not gonna hear the case and not going to delay trump s trial. so much fourth or thereabouts can still occur. andrew, what do you still see when you have this trial calendar? the same reaction as neal listening to the argument, and particularly judge pan take apart the argument. many ways just getting the lawyer to actually say what they are arguing because it was so preposterous. so the more that argument went on, the more you thought, i think, as neal does that the odds of the supreme court saying, you know what? don t need to hear this. what you are arguing is just so preposterous. it doesn t mea