and on this 680-foot ship, called the louis majesty, a rogue wave smashes through the window on the voyage from spain to italy in march of 2010, sending disoriented passengers scrambling through water. two people are killed. another video from a helicopter shows an enormous ship tossed around in the ocean like a child s toy. you might imagine how things could go wrong in rough seas, but what if a ship is sailing on calm waters? less than five years before the costa concordia disaster, an eerily similar situation unfolds. while sailing through the greek islands, another ship runs aground when it collides with a reef and forces a hasty evacuation for hundreds of scared passengers. fear was just tremendous, from her perspective. fleeing for safety before their ship sinks to the bottom of the sea. this promotional video for the
looking into the e-mails that come out or are they going to drop this? is it going to become an old story? is the media going to essentially give her a pass on this over the long haul? i don t think they are going to give her a pass. i think when you get into the benghazi timelines and blumenthal it s murky. by the way, those private e-mails from blumenthal to secretary of state clinton, what happened to the liberal media giving hillary special treatment? the new york times is doing yoman s work here. they are doing a great job of covering hillary clinton and basically treating her as a hostile witness because that s what she is. and they are doing a great job. also i think the decision whose ever decision it was to like to the times in advance so it wouldn t be a friday afternoon news dump and go to the bottom of the sea was good.
drop this? will it be an old story? is the media going to give her a pass on all of in over the long haul? that is a huge question. i think some of this gets to the benghazi timeline is complicated. it is murky. we are in a 140-character e-mail time. the story was broken by new york times and private e-mail story so, what happens if the liberal media giving this treatment. new york times is doing yeoman s work. they are doing a great job of covering hillary clinton as basically treating her as a hostile witness. that is what she is. they are doing a great job. the decision, whoever has the decision to leak to the new york times in a break so it was not a friday afternoon news damp and go to the bottom of the sea. treatinger hads a hostile
looking into the e-mails that come out or are they going to drop this? is it going to become an old story? is the media going to essentially give her a pass on this over the long haul? i don t think they are going to give her a pass. i think when you get into the benghazi timelines and blumenthal it s murky. by the way, those private e-mails from blumenthal to secretary of state clinton, what happened to the liberal media giving hillary special treatment? the new york times is doing yoman s work here. they are doing a great job of covering hillary clinton and basically treating her as a hostile witness because that s what she is. and they arejob. also i think the decision whose ever decision it was to like to the times in advance so it wouldn t be a friday afternoon news dump and go to the bottom of the sea was good. treating her as a hostile
to italy in march of 2010. sending disoriented passengers scrambling through water. two people are killed. another video from a helicopter shows an enormous ship tossed around in the ocean like a child s toy. you might imagine how things could go wrong in rough seas, but what if a ship is sailing on calm waters? less than five years before the costa concordia disaster, an eerily similar situation unfolds. while sailing through the greek islands, another ship runs aground when it collides with a reef and forces a hasty evacuation for hundreds of scared passengers. fear was just tremendous from her perspective. fleeing for safety before their ship sinks to the bottom of the sea. this promotional video for the