he sees some alliance there. is this dangerous for the u.s. i think it is the big question the reality is that, as long a xi jinping it is alignin himself with autocrats dictators, and war criminals he is not being the kind o international leader he aspire to be. china says they are going to b the next superpowers t supplant the united states i don t think that is true but if he wants to be, he s go to start acting like a responsible world leader a responsible world leader doe not support a war criminal illegal war. i wouldn t mention this earlier with allie, nbc news reporting that they ar thinking out of the white hous potentially they should seek a softer tone on china ahead o this putin and xi meeting, because u.s. officials are concerned that if you have sharper rhetoric towards china it could backfire by pushing xi, if you will, into a corner he does feel compelled to then send lethal aid to russia. what s your reaction to that
so given those specifics, what do they tell you? it doesn t narrow it down very much. you can go on the internet right now and probably get enough information to organize this kind of attack. you can read the aspire magazine and get enough information to do this. people have said it before, it s absolutely true. at this point on what we know, it could be anything from a lone wolf to a well organized terrorist organization. reporter: so many broad possibilities right there. what about these unexploded devices? we don t know exactly how many there are, but we have been told there was at least one, maybe more. what can investigators find out from them? if it is, indeed, an unexploded device and it is related to these two incidents, it will be a gold mine. the fact that they got that bomb intact led them so quickly right