most of these business deals are with foreign heavy hitters and with the president refusing to die vest ownership of any of his businesses, experts argue that they are potential violations of the clause of the constitution, which prohibits the president from accepting payments or anything of economic value from foreign governments. in fact, we re going to have one of those experts on next. she said something that really struck me because i ve been traveling the world for a living for quite some time, and lately, i m hearing what she s hearing. what s distressing to me is people laughing at us, they re laughing at us. a heart transplant. that s a whole different ballgame. i was in shock. i am very proud of the development of drugs that can prevent the rejection and prevent the recurrence of the original disease. i never felt i was going to die. we know so much about transplantation. and we re living longer. you cannot help but be inspired by the opportunities that
is bent on self enrichment rather than bent on serving its own people. it s a bad sign. before he took office, the president tried some say unsuccessfully to draw a line under his past by putting his business empire into a trust held by his sons. his lawyers also dug deep into the statute books and pulled out a get-out clause exempting a president from prosecution over conflicts of interest. the president embraced that legal opinion immediately. i have a no-conflict situation business i m president. is he right? is the president above conflict of interest laws? in terms of the integrity of our government, america has been relying on a tissue of norms and expectations. it turns out that a determined kleptcrat will blow through
to be built outside the united states and carry the name trump on it was built. our investigation as you ll see shows that criminals from all over the world use this building as a laundromat for their money. but the trump organization doesn t actually own the building. it made a licensing deal with a local developer so the president basically just gets paid for the use of his name. does that mean he can t be held responsible for any of the criminal activity that happened here? the trump organization says, it does mean just that. but anti-corruption experts disagree. it s a question of good business practice they say. and because we have a president who owns a global business, business practices matter. here s our exclusive investigation in conjunction with our friends at reuters into that building. hello. i m ivanka trump. welcome to it was the first trump-branded tower to go up
government management, campaigning on the ticket of the outsider. in 2009, martinelli ran a colorful campaign. the crazy one. a name he happily embraced. he even created a slogan that he used during the campaign c l called, we the crazy people are the majority. and they were. he won by a landslide on the promise of a better future for panama. for a while, it seemed he d kept his word, the economy boomed, unemployment dropped, he oversaw an expansion of the panama canal and opens a subway system, but soon, allegations of corruption started to surface. martinelli was more than a president.
department and robert mueller to on the other hand a viewer who wrote in to tell me go, trump. my 401(k) is doing great. media still mad at losing the election. this isn t about politics. this is about what you think of the responsibilities that apply to an american company that comes to a place like this to do business. should it uphold standards that we expect back in the states? or, should it play by whatever rules the local market or the global market play by? we already know which side of this argument president trump is on because he told us himself. in 2012, president trump called into squawk box on cnbc to express a clear opinion of the law that forbids american officials from briding. they do what they have to do. it s horrible law and it should be changed. i mean, we leer like the policemen for the world. it s ridiculous. question answered. rachel will be back on monday