subsequently, as a matter of fact the next day i said we need to continue to investigate. we need to get the mueller report unredacted and very frankly, i think we need mr. mueller s testimony before the judiciary committee or other committees that have legitimate reasons for hearing his testimony so that when i said that original statement, it was at this time. that was the immediate response to the report, but since that time let me just interrupt for a second, mr. leader, why was it in your words impeachment not worthwhile at this point immediately after the mueller report was released, but it is potentially worthwhile now? well, i didn t say it was wolf, i know you and other reporters keep asking and they want us to say we re for impeachment. what we are for is continuing our investigations, making sure the administration gives us the information that we are constitutionally authorized to receive from the executive department to make decisions on behalf of the american peop
found that 44% of democratic primary voters have already made up their minds about who they ll support in 2020. that s up eight points since april and comes before those 23 democratic candidates appear on their first debate stage just less than a month away. wolf. thank you. just ahead, he played a key role in the failed submit between president trump and kim jong-un, and one report said he was executed because of it. tonight we re learning what really happened. painting be done. and stay done. behr, ranked #1 in customer satisfaction with interior paints, and keeps all your doing done. great paint, new low price. starting at $24.98. exclusively at the home depot.
quickly on this, robert mueller testimony now all of a sudden the house judiciary chairman jerry nadler says he doesn t want mueller to testify in public. it s got to be in private. it s got to be in public. i m not surprised. what they want from bob mueller is somebody sitting there who s got credibility, even if he is just telling you what he said in the report, most of the american public hasn t read the mueller report, so he s got to say this is what my report says. this is why this report is important. he did that in his nine or ten-minute statement the other day, but i do think that nadler believes, and i would agree with him, that it s important for the american public to hear it from the horse s mouth. the man who has spent the last two years of his life investigating this and who, by the way, has a good reputation with the american public. it s gone up and down and up and down as the white house tried to discredit him, but at this point they believe that he has done a
testimony, for information regarding the operations of the executive department. i think it s i can t believe that there is another instance where there has been this broad a refusal to give information which is legitimately asked for by the representatives of the american people. so at this point in time, i would advise mr. nadler that we are not going to take any action to stop the vote this coming week. let me just be precise there. are you still also demanding that in addition to the full mueller unredacted report you also get all the underlying evidence? i want to talk to nadler about that, but i think the answer to that is yes, but it s not just the report. what you have is a blanket refusal directed by the president of the united states to not respond to questions and requests for testimony and documents from the congress of the united states. that s unacceptable under the constitution. it s unacceptable for
house-controlled democrats. the house intelligence committee did actually reach an agreement on their subpoena related to underlying information in the mueller report earlier on. there s some kind of a paradigm with success here. based on what the request has been, based on how jerry nadler has been very stout throughout that he wants the full unredacted report and based on the fact house democrats are more uneasy than they ve ever been about what they ve gotten in return for that request from the white house, right now it appears unlikely that anything. this latest offer from the justice department comes as the white house continues to stone wall the judiciary committee s subpoena for documents from two key former white house officials. what will the democrats do in response to that? it s still an open question, but it s very likely or at least very possible that hope hicks, the former white house communications director, one of the closest aides to president trump during her tame