it is the one that the evidence to get him is so strong already. what about seditious conspiracy, which is the big one here. the big ticket item they have recently begun to brought against the proud boys and the other terrorist. you heard the people in the committee he spurred, he instigated, what you need for conspiracy is he agreed he had to agree and then take an extra step. i do not think they have yet either given or even asserted that they will give that kind of agreement. that is what the prosecutors in doj would be looking for. importantly, this other point. even under the kool-aid offense, it doesn t entitle him to send people to burst into the proceedings. every bit against the law, if he aids and abets them he is just as guilty as they are under the federal coat. you make a couple good points there, i want to add the committee member elaine laurier