burgin and phillip mud. what do you make of this? in more than a decade since 9/11, we ve come to understand the sorts of words, code words thaw use. you learn from them people you captured and surveillance and foreign intelligence services and we ve gotten much better and we listen for that. you load surveillance systems to trigger the system to alert analysts when they capture those sorts of words. this is an indication we ve matured in terms of intelligence capability to identify the threat and act on it. phil, you say picking up this intelligence is standard operating procedure but the information should have never been leaked to the public, correct? no, i think there is a difference between what we know and if there is cause for concern across middle east. a difference when you play a cat and mouse game against terrorist telling them how we know. it s legitimate to tell americans we have access to al qaeda officials talking about a
this or are you not worried? a lot of times jurors will rush a verdict through based upon the circumstances of their life and the cal dendarcalendar. it s very important thaw use the clock and you use their time, so you have to bring them in on a sunday and work. well, we ll get to all that more tomorrow. let s look at what happened yesterday because the state brought in this rebuttal witness, and this was an employer for cindy anthony, casey s mom, who said basically during her and cindy anthony s testimony, saying, you know, i was the one who searched for chloroform and did it on the computer, and this man is saying actually she was at work. what does that do to the testimony? well, it makes her look like a really good mom trying to lie for her daughter, but as far as the premeditation, it kind of puts that back on the table a little bit there. i mean, listen, is it a juror ultimately going to say over a computer search the difference between premeditated murder and aggravated