reporter: the look on her face says it all. jumping into the arms of her father. that s army staff sergeant daniel london, but she calls him dad. just back after an eight-month deployment to afghanistan. i missed you. i missed you, too. i still think this is a dream. reporter: he s spent three tours in afghanistan. he and alexis mother both first deployed when alexis was just 15 months old. i missed her fifth and tenth birthday. reporter: even when he s back home, he still serves as a new york city firefighter. i know she s very happy. the fact that it happened for valentine s day, it will be hard to top. reporter: it will be hard to top. this moment, a valentine s surprise to remember. there s not words to explain how much i miss him.
to his constitutional oath should be enough said. by my count he s a lieutenant colonel so he s vowed an oath to defend the constitution at least five times in his career, probably more than that. that tells you everything you need to know. he is dependent on supporting the nation, not a president, a chief or a land. i want to ask you while i have you about it s kind of the water cooler talk, right? this dog that was involved in this raid that took out the leader of isis, his picture was declassified. his name has not been. why is that important, in your view? there is a lot of silliness associated with that, and i tweeted this yesterday to bring up a conversation about national security. this dog went on a mission with delta force, the most secretive organization the army has. there are ways of people finding out what forces are where based on small pieces of information. of course, in the genre of twitter, i got all kinds of
did like overall trump s hard line policy on isolationism. but he himself referred to this as a drug deal. i think as a factual matter, as a legal matter, the case is really overwhelming at this point. i think any in-line prosecutor could get an indictment on a bribery charge. the question is, when they take this to the public process, can they persuade that middle third? that s always the question with impeachment. julian, ross, sam, thank you so much to all of you for the discussion. fox news anchor and some republicans are questioning the patriotism of the army lieutenant colonel testifying in the impeachment inquiry today. one calling the purple heart recipient s appointment to the national security council by the trump white house a double agent. plus, since facebook will allow false political ads, one man says he will run for office for the sole purpose of spreading lies to prove the facebook policy is wrong. he s going to join me live.
now run for office purposely spreading lies to force the tech giant to reverse course. he will join us live. we begin with what could very well be the most damning testimony yet in the impeachment inquiry against president trump. right now house investigators are hearing from a current white house official, army lieutenant colonel alex vindman. vindman was on the july 25th call between president trump and president zelensky, and according to a statement received by cnn, he was so alarmed by what he heard that he alerted his superiors twice. he wrote, i was concerned by the call. i did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a u.s. citizen, and i was warned about the implications for the u.s. government s support of ukraine. i realized that if ukraine pursued an investigation into the bidens and burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would
right now on capitol hill, republicans are facing one of their biggest tests of the impeachment inquiry. they re hearing from the first current white house official and the first person who was actually on the july 25th ukraine call. that s army lieutenant colonel army officer alex vindman whose specialty was ukraine. he was so troubled by president trump troubling the president of ukraine to investigate joe biden and his son hunter that he told his boss twice. some are questioning vindman by insulting his politics. trump called vindman a never trumper, which is there is no basis doing. and others have gone to insulting vindman in a much more viral way. their questioning is patriotism. here we ever a u.s. national security official who is