about half firearms. about half of all u.s. households have at least lea one gun at home, and many have. much more than that. plus, they have ammo, billions and billions of rounds of it. those are all real numbers, butg they are hardly an argument forn gun control. they re an argument, in fact, against ask yourself what would it require to confiscate allmmuo those guns and all that ammunition in turn, the united states into disarmed nation like turkmenistan or north korea? wellrea., it would take a police state and it would end in civil war. nono sam sane person wants eithr one of those things. but thankfully, we don t neehinn the fact that so manyirearm americans have a firearm withi n reach but never commit violence that gtbe that guns are no the problem. just as we can this country can be trusted with an ar-15, just as we can be trusted with cars and light aircraft t in andand electricity, basebaw and insecticide and chainsaws and pruning shearsct and countless other objec
length about this on the air. an ak is anyny question at thead happened. you said so at the time and nowl are trying to hurt you for saying that. that s what it looks like to me. yes. this is just one of the manythey things that they ve done, you t know, to tryo try to silence m. but, yeah, the lawsuit thatay te i filed was becausey di on the first story that they did, the new york timesd,i they used me as a basically a whipping post, all of ttwenty 20 to try to silence and discredit me. but the first story was on easter sunday and i wasn theo woken up very early innd he the morning by a friendsa who lived back east and said, hey, the online story, a new york times has your your congressional i.d. showing your social security number. it t we need to get it down.ook a fet it took a few hours. wey got it down.d co and they did complmpy with takin it dowg n. but it was very it was very awful. so i did try to file a lawsuit . i lost. blic inter the judge ruled that it was in the public i