would pay instead of, you know, spreading wealth based on need. money woulneedd be allocated to individuals purely based on the issue of race. racnow, the premise, according to the left, would be to compensate for the evils oflavey slavery. now, first, the country billn simply cannot afford the billions and billions of dollars and trillion s of dollars that it would likely take to allocate and ultimatelyn ,i t is a punitive measure and one that will even furthervi dividede a country thaty deep is already deeply divided. those who support reparationly o believe that america is an evile country filled to the brim with generous notions of bad people. and while no intelligent perso n ,let me be clear, deniese the evils of slavery, it wouldnl be a great injustice to ignore all the progress this country has made on racial issues and other issues. which is the beauty o our great constitution. it has provide d all of us a roadmap that we can right wrongs and correct injustices. o
four point eight trillion saved over 10 years. that8 trillit s me to me is fisl responsibility and all the other things that you mentioned. now , let s say that biden says this is my final offer and you bring that deal backo to your caucus. you thinkyour you re going to get a majority in to your caucus to go along with this last minute deal after he wouldn t even talk to you for one hundred days. sean , i believe we can if we come to a good agreement, because think of this.e was weno the president said he wasnt going to negotiate. we were just going to raisell w the debt ceiling. first of allhaveus, we have jus. been able to have a victory.th the president can noe pr longery that. so, no, the debt ceiling will not get raised with no changeos. if we get a fundamental change d where we get a cap and what we re spending, that sin trillions of dollars saving.tory if w we e change the trajectory where we get work requirements . that s the biggest welfaread reform we ve had since since