the defense was an expert that says that salman didn t have the mental capacity to understand her confession. she said she drove around to other possible targets in florida. forensic experts testified that salman s phone of her husband s phone ever pinged at the nightclub. they talked about how bad it would be if a club got attacked. she said she wished she told someone but was too afraid. we just heard the jury reconvened to ask the judge a question. we ll keep you updated. shepard: matt, thanks. we don t know what the question was or whether the court was able to answer that question. when all that information comes together, we ll get it to you. facebook is trying to make it easier for people to control their privacy settings. nice timing. the word has come that a data firm tried to tied to trump
election, the $130,000 you re saying could be seen as a campaign contribution that was on its face illegal. that s what daniels attorney is saying. he is saying this was an illegal campaign contribution and the contract was for that purpose. and therefore, a court shouldn t enforce a contract whose aim was to be illegal. the president is arguing that it s a simple contract. there was an offer. there was an acceptance and consideration. the payment of the $130,000. stormy daniels and her attorney are making another argument. the contract should fail because donald trump didn t sign it himself. well, that is their weakest argument because donald trump wasn t a party to the contract. he was rather what is called a third party beneficiary to it. shepard: so in your estimation from the letter of the law, the president, then donald trump, didn t sign it is irrelevant and immaterial. that doesn t matter.