for a lay person that it s not public. that you can t see it t like period, you can t see it. and that would go to ongoing investigations. and then there s a part that is public, but as you ve known from seeing it, it s really heavily redacted that section as well. it allegations that manafort broke the agreement by continuing contact with the administration, though he had been told to cease all contact. tucker: there s a story tonight, we can t confirm it that in parts of that filing the investigations ongoing that are referred to in the document pertain to tony podesta. right. i don t have that independently but what i could say as a data point is that it makes a lot of sense to me because what we ve been seeing in the background here is that there is an investigation looking at tony podesta and his lobbying work and also the former, i believe he was the white house counsel under the obama administration, greg craig. one of the questions republicans have had is whether the specia
what about the gate in front of pelosi s weekend house. is saint pelosi against that? of course not. republicans say the left opposes borders, we ve said that many times. but it s not quite true. in their own lives democrats are all for exclusivity. they re not in a hurry to re-set refugees on martha s vineyard. american is a sinful nation they tell us. we can only at tone for those sins by giving what we have to the entire world. there s a lesson for republicans. the approximate got elected by promising a border wall. people wanted that. the president pledged that in almost every speech he gave. president trump: we re going to build a wall it s going to be a big wall, strong wall, real wall, nobody is coming through unless it s legal. nobody. anybody. it s going to be a big wall, not a toy wall like we have right now. [ crowd chanting build that wall! ] president trump: don t worry, folks, we re going to be building the wall! . tucker: well paul ryan never
the wall signifies ownership. you guys own uni vision and your home. you get to decide who comes over. if you have a dinner party with your friends, that s great. if twelve strangers come in and eat your footed it s an invasion. the key factor is your choice. you get to decide who comes into your home because it s your home. same with your office, same with our country, which is america where i was born. we have don t have a right to say who comes in or out? that s immoral? how? i think the us has every right to secure it s borders and it s done that for past half a century. we ve spent in the past 12 years a hundred billion dollars on border security. this is a misleading narrative. border second turt. tucker: wait. wait. you re confusing things. so i guess the obvious question is how did we get 2 two million illegal aliens living in our country if the border is so secure? why are you against a wall? it s another form of border security.
by saimpson hatcher which talke about the pay to play expectation by big be donors. this will confirm what we ve known. for the life of me how you can launch an investigation based on the steele dossier which comey admitted was salacious and unverified but you can look at the other information and say well there s nothing to see here, proves the point that tom finton made earlier. justice seems to be not balanced and seems to be partisan. tucker: pay for play offer to foreigners from a foundation run by the secretary of state, that s in a criminal category, is it not? absolutely. people make this mistake all the time. they say it s a charity. it s very very clear the bribery charges in the united states, the international bribery standards to which hillary clinton as secretary of state committed the united states to, the international bribery standard says if you donate to a
god hates walls. if walls are immoral, what about fences? obama seemed it like them. the bill before us, will certainly do some good. it will authorize some badly needed funding for better fences and better security along our borders scombchlt that should help stem some of the tide of illegal immigration in this country. tucker: better fences says obama. that sounds immoral. what about israel s security wall until it s big and real and very effective. pelosi supported it and voted for a resolution defending that wall from un condemnation. it s confusing. it must have been before her conversion. now that walls are definitely immoral, a few obvious theological questions arise. what about doors and locks? how about hedges or security systems oral airport check points or anything else that s specifically designed to keep some people out?