the only answer to all of our problems. jon: we still have what, about 10 months to go till the midterm elections but the ads are already on the air. charlie hirt, lynn sweet. thank you both. thanks, jon. thank you. jenna: turning to another big story today, the nsa is responding to a new report that claims the agency is using secret technology to spy on 100,000 computers worldwide and that it expand create a digital highway for launching cyber attacks even if the computers are off-line. peter doocy is live in washington with more on this story. peter? reporter: that s right, jenna, the nsa can get inside more than 100,000 computers all around the world even if they re off-line with this technology that uses tiny transmitters either inserted inside of a device or tell thinkly snuck in through with a usb cable. that second example, usb cable, some nsa target help the agency
the 2010 census reported 55% of americans 55 and older don t have regular access to the internet. the va moving in this direction is absolutely the right way to go. but to penalize veterans who don t have the capability for the opportunity of resources to file a claim electronically sometimes by tens of thousands of dollars is too much. it is too severe. jenna: the amount of time to fill out these forms and provide the documentation required would cause them to lose up to a year of benefits. jenna: why does the va sadist necessary to now do it this way? for dozens of years veterans have been able to make a disability claimant asked for benefits in a variety of ways. physically sending a a paper request outlining their injury. they could even submit on the back of a napkin as long as it was stated. this led to a chaotic system.
limiting specific speech. we ll have to wait and see. it was very spirited debate. a very spirited arguement today with a lot of passion on both side as we saw from protesters outside the court case, jenna. we ll have a decision by june. jenna: interesting case, shannon. thank you. jon: now a fox news alert and the senate tell against committee just released a bipartisan report on benghazi this morning, revealing more details on the deadly september 11th terror attacks on the u.s. consulate and cia annex in 2012, saying those attacks were preventible. u.s. ambassador chris stevens and three other americans died in those attacks. chief intelligence catherine herridge has been looking a the report. she has the latest from capitol hill. reporter: thank you, jon. just within the last few minutes we wrapped up an interview with a ranking member of the senate intelligence committee who said very directly that based on the intelligence assessments by the cia and the defense intelligence age
well, there is no secret agreement. the fact of the matter, it was secret to us. it wasn t secret to those negotiating because they actually put an agreement, a non-paper, in with the agreement and they also gave that non-paper to the iaea who are not americans. so they should release it to congress. jenna: sorry to interrupt you because i want to make sure our viewers know what we re talking about. the last 24, 4hours there are a variety of reports in the l.a. times and other papers there is some sort of a side agreement that iran s foreign minister referred to. that spark ad lot of questions to the administration what side agreement are they talking about? is there something there? that s what you re saying any agreement or non-paper agreement quote-unquote in normal circumstances would be released to the public? absolutely. the agreement and all of the details that go with it, the details are what the state department is saying is a non-paper. it is what, no one in congress and
seniors generally like it. there is important difference between a program like part-d and obamacare. the main thing part-d provide ad benefit seniors didn t have by and large. second it was voluntary. seniors do not have to sign up for part-d. if there were glitches or problems, it was an issue that seniors could choose to devolve themselves with. in this case obamacare is mandatory. you re required to buy insurance under the lay or pay a tax penalty. i think there is a big difference in terms of the long-term implications of the popularity of obamacare if, if the costs keep going up and people feel like they re paying too much for a product that they re being required to buy. jenna: here s another big argument that we hear as well. it is easy to forget how bad things were in the past. this is going to improve dramatically the insurance market for folks that have preexisting conditions, that would be uninsurable or young people. what about that argument? well, it s good deal,