Good evening, everyone. Im laura ingraham. This is the angle. Thanks, as always for being with us tonight. Forcing families hand, thats the focus of tonights angle. Today fani willis lost her special prosecutor, her credibility and any for a political future. And democrats dream drowning donald trump in a flood of legal cases is not working out like theyd hoped. And now theyre the ones caught. Neanderthal. A technical win for Fulton County District Attorney fani willis, but a massive indictment on her behavior. And its a slap to the head to the prosecutor, but not a fatal knock down plunge. Its highly unlikely that this will start before the election. This really did help the trump team, not only in terms of delaying it, but also in undermining the credibility of the overall justice and the prosecutions against trump. Judge scott mcafee didnt take the entire load off. He didnt flat out her from the election interference case, but the ruling handed down today was filled with bad news fo
Hello, everyone. Im sandra smith, along with judge jeanine, judge jeanine pirro, i should say. Harold ford is here and pete hegseth and greg gutfeld. 5 00its 5 00 in New York City. And this is the fight. All right. The big news, special prosecutor nathan wade falling on his sword to protect his former flame. Bonnie willis dramatically stepping down from the trump Georgia Election case. Georg judge scott mcafee had given the Fulton County d. A. Judge theme massive ultimatum. It happened earlier that shee mu must cut ties. Wade or step aside herself. Willis silent so far. Dg and while the judge did not outright disqualify her, he did not let he didnt willis skate cy back by calling the pairs junduct a tremendous lapse of judgment. But he says theyre bad choicees do not constitute a direct conflict of interest. The judge alsoe a bonnies furis courtroom appearance, saying that She Behavedshe Test in unprofessional manner when she testified. I think you live right here. No, no, no, no. This
in tonight with its opposition to gop calls for stronger work requirements to be included in o anpposity budget agreement thatd be paired with a debt ceilingde increasebt cei. the issu now, the issue of a work requirement has actually emerged as one of the biggest remaining hurdles for reaching an agreement between negotiators for the white house and houseite ho republicans. rhere is a top gop negotiatous who s weighing in on thisighi tonight. that s louisiana congressman garret graveng in on thi s loui he said tonight his party will not drop their demand for tougher work requirements as part of a final agreement. now, democrats have converselypi argued that, listen, social benefit programs already have s as work requirements in place,n plc adding that to them. this is ale.l an necessary. meanwhile, as you pointed out, the president and his top advisers were over at camp david this weekend working perhap s as is june 5th. deadline quickly approaches. jason , we re all going t
is that our own media has failed to do its job. i mean, even if the new york times reported on this, they reporteiled to d on it on the surface, then they buried it and they completely buried everythingheyo that is connected to the biden family. and that sthen the deeply conce. but because it tells me that. the white house is compromise and everything that they tried to accuse president trump of these themselves are guilty ofte in such anlv egregious and dangerous way that it s put our nation s national security at risk. yeah, i think ultimately not only the enrichment ofbi the biden family, buden t the national intelligence implications are absolutely untold at this point and need deep investigation. sarah , greg, thanks fort joining us tonight. really do appreciate it. after needlessep inveshank you g politics into its brandingng target, bud light, north face and the los angeles dodgers are all facing serious consumer
2004 e, the intelligence terrorism pveion act a, in order to ensure that terrorism related information was shared effectively. and in a timely manner. ambassador thanks fort? joining us. so clear this up for us do we have a stove piping issue? are intelligence agencies still holding on to this information? have we taken a step back in terms of sharing? taken a step back anything like what we had in the case of 9/11 and even in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. starting i 2006 we actually created an information sharing st takes years to get that up and running. we re talking about an information sharing system that s international, national outte sector. and that information sharing system is functioning but not functioning as well as we d like it to and certainly in the case of the boston tragedy not as well as it ought to have. there were mistakes made.