Because they are earned in the view of these people, rightly or wrongly. To a significant degree, wrongly. And significantly antielitist, that theres a wisdom in the collective that the elites often are combating. He wrote, and i thought this was quite a remarkable statement, the tea party is jacksonian american aroused, angry, and above all fearful backed by the new american demography that threatens its interests and scorns its values. They view obama as a sort of, having a conscious strategy of Building Political support by increasing americas dependence on government, and they i in polls of the tea party conducted by Pew Research Center and others suggest that these people consider obama as pushing america towards socialism. Well, thats not entirely wrong in the sense that obama seems to be ad slow candidate of advocate of europeanstyle social democracy. So this is a powerful strain in american politics. It has significant antecedents in our political tradition. It may not be a big
Thats how you grow an economy. Got to have an effective transportation and Health Care Delivery system. What one issue, though, what one issue do you want to be remembered for . [inaudible] you sill have a still more time, 20 more seconds. Creating jobs and diversifying the economy. Thats how you grow and diversify the economy. Dorothy, who was with me here tonight, we want our children to stay here. Two in college, one in the naval academy, but the two in college are getting out soon, we want them to stay here. You needs jobs of the future to keep your chirp here. Thank you. More platitudes, no plans. I dont doubt that he wants more people having jobs in virginia, but he has yet to lay out a detailed plan. Its clear he doesnt like me plan, but i have one. You know, saying the words education and research, thats all great, but those are goals, platitudes, not plans. I like those too. I like education. I like puppies, but i dont bring a puppy home if i dont have a plan, or guess what my
Better than the minority of their own party. I have serious reservations about that characterization. I think a lot of people went to the floor on that monday and voted no because they thought the leadership have the votes to pass the bill. They couldnt gather gavel back in. I think that was true of both sides. Not so much on your side. Nobody ever casts political votes on your side. On this one judd wait a second. Its about politicians and politics and i know that may upset some people because we are only supposed to these talking about finances. You are two months before an election. This is a freebie on the incumbent party. Its a free shot on goal without a goalie in the goal box in the Democratic Party is in the majority voted. It was not unpopular afterthefact. It was unpopular when it was implemented. It was unpopular. You cant put lipstick on that. The majority of our party voted for something of the incumbent president of the other party that would help solve a problem in the m
The exception that would allow evidence in the words of the rule the exclusion of which would violate the Constitutional Rights of the accused. What does that mean . The rule does not define what that means for the practitioner. But in my experience come evidence of the sort usually falls into one of several readily recognized categories. For example, evidence of previous sexual behavior that establishes bias, prejudice or motives that fabricate on the part of the alleged victim in the case. Similarly, this exception is used in military practice to admit evidence of don sturdily false allegations of prior sexual behavior by the alleged victims or sexual behavior of predisposition thats so distinctive and so similar to the sexual offense at issue that explains or provides context for the instant delegations. Interestingly, many states codify these commonly encountered circumstances in their own rules of evidence for criminal cases, but in military practice practice these are adjudicated