wavote twhfo soluly tenofo rerterthe me s ner lu saidhat nohe reere d s r jiwereno idt explted an thatjireno pld anth re atth ercing tir lal rht te i what ci t l r at woulwa mebo ulwa botobe to anadvote for pele to partipatin the anvoproc s.r pe to rtat e oc rorte anher compint ca outof rthe teoup anhor an mpund t cautofevidce e of p hofrd.an w ji d dad id as ng frfo j d specl prosutorasnd foalso stroer ucatn. ec osif or yosuspt so ro vong patblem wher yospyou ve, vo pem eru , go to xnewcom.to gyn:hat diurbi. ank u, er . ew m. esid t n:t diobbia isnounng k his tentns f er se nd idobisun
ld lows.e. toark meyooe t ofhore i ha got ows.o go. k mal qck ohe lt ofre worhaoto. q o lt .or no. no. ill: o beie b aks he . bistor h is s.ing t t l:be athis int ump unni b ans he wasbior h rig sg t abo cricats t p beinniout thean atasigbo cc int bs.het u goto teterioly. ank u,.erni go in t ment, h isioha. k cheniy in shn to m got,g hsn. it ainnehe sh rigto?go -mayb notit ne wiltellou wt haened inigetro and -ybhica.ot illl whaed inrondca
ngntrorsy. tipublans n t nt tir reou caouidatfto bthessue ey wt theroy. pside to bls t tthe caat beue iss. whe p de o ill: nter tinge all ght. ank u, bt. ss plty me ahd as t fac rl:erng mol s alt.g th k b venipl. m ah asfact t invtigaon, acdgen moal th utah m rniease a ct cnvldga, e rapt wh has notah merve a r dayse an c ison ap this ne igoinwhto mseotouveay gry. on isen, irniein m gdbern how t y. mediis tatin , ie gerossieow t ump esidditial tun.in weope u sta tedohosesi repop s.id al. wee ta tse po
don wkn w.th ed e catndp dt.si i nee co nn tantk foc .on, ca p dweve s n s meeethog tnntoc n, esidt caturni ve tentn aw fro m. n hmarta: h bolidtoncarn lwys nt a awearo.re, ank u ve ar hch. ll: olsmalonl cou ntrbt soa a , sik ificvet in he w on . : tealor ou trmarbha.to > a masioic ine wvenrsal i nte a . licy a mef-conf esseedsai n mastmindf91 icyl not-cf se comeo thus. orstnd t riial.t d orahmebuth ligameti othe washed ahiot of alge planflowin hehes i o peagonshe actsa veto an owthatinnd cnrsman pete rpeon e tsking n whve ht attorn at c geral nlamresanpecegre fo ng wh thatrn d cigel am.c gre > thals i > l - mtha: e strts of diso ma:wi scoenssrof wisoonsi reubcws hiavecons go hi fir ewicasilr c h taeet n in he attl er tirt ecanrover ta nn tl co rove tial ion bll.er ll ll y abo that. cove l nfoe bol .- go g l ybohtt e -xnewgocom, lickn th st rd taand ee ha e th hottewtm,stckies thf e da ranta ndmeback hre anthwatctt ths m! e lldae ri ht ckack hre inantc hmerim snewsoom llrk n
all right. for 14 years a new orleans man was on death row. he was weeks from being executed, and then he got the news. he had been wrongly convicted. a jury agreed, and awarded john thompson $14 million in a civil suit against the new orleans district attorney s office because it hid the blood evidence that could have cleared him. but then on tuesday, the u.s. supreme court, by a vote of 5-4, overturned that compensation. and now thompson gets nothing. here now is john thompson, joining him is john hallway, the author of the book killing time which is about thompson s quest to clear his name. thank u both for joining me today. mr. thompson, i want to start with you. 18 years in jail you spent, 14 on death row. just weeks from execution, as i just mentioned. how do you feel about the supreme court s decision just came down?