allegations on three occasions and by the way, rod rosenstein approved one at least, maybe two. then he appoints mueller. if that is not a conflict, i don t know what is. there is a troubling allergy at the department of justice when it comes to transparency. they are fighting against every effort by the congress to show the american people what is really happening. we have requested more than 1.3 million records in the judiciary committee and we have only gotten 3,000 so far. this should not be in dispute. this is not a draft work product. this is a final report that indicates the deputy director of the f.b.i. engaged in political hackery he had to be fired before his esrig nation. resignation. to suggest that is not a document the american people should see is ludicrous. this stonewalling eroded the trust of the american people and the folks we need to rely on most to keep rule of law sacred and preserved in the united states. sean: congressmen, thank
on three occasions. by the way, rod rosenstein approved one of them, may be two. he s the guy that appoints mueller. if that s not a conflict, i don t know what it is. there is a troubling allergy at the department of justice when it comes to transparency. they are fighting against every effort by the congress to show the american people what is really happening. we ve requested more t than 1.3 million records in the dish area committee, we ve only gotten about 3,000 of them so far. they should not be dispute. this is a final report that indicates that the deputy director of the fbi had engaged in such political hackery that he had to be fired before his own resignation. to suggest that that is not a document that the american people deserve to see is ludicrous and it s this type of stonewalling has a rod of the trust of the american people and the very folks we need to be w able to rely on to keep the rule of law sacred. sean: congressman, thank you. we appreciate it. we now turn
and i think that should concern all americans regardless of their party or what they think about, you know, mueller s investigation into the president himself. you know what s bizarre about these tweets on one level, we re talking about the president of the united states. there s an obvious conversation how he should conduct himself. his base doesn t care. we know where people are on it. he has the best access to information than anybody. he could say come over here with this fisa application on carter page. i want to see it. explain this to me. he insists on relying on right wing propaganda. isn t that odd? that he has access to the information. it is hackery, which is really disappointing in the president of the united states
promises for the future? i love to have a story broken down for me in a different way. the news can get really dark the deeper you go. that s why i loved jon so much. that s why i loved the daily show so much. you re doing theater when you should be doing debate. which would be great you do what you do is partisan hackery. you ve got to be kidding me you re on cnn the show that leads into me is puppets making crank phone calls. what is wrong with you? all the comedians that came out of stewart s shop, the larry wilmores, the john olivers, the samantha bees, they re saying what they feel, they re very passionate, they re very pointed. and often very partisan. i think they make no bones about it. on this show, your voice will be heard. in the form of my voice. because you re looking at a straight shooter, america. i tell it like it is. i calls em like i see them. i will speak to you in plain,
and hillary clinton. that was a mess. dana: the democratic senator from your home state, joe manchun, on this question of stand up, don t stand up, clap, don t clap. watch. just sit there and frown is not gonna fix anything, so let s embrace each other and try to make it work. when we disagree, we can work through that. dana: what about that visual last night of republicans cheering at everything the president said and the democrats sitting on their hands, even when you talked about rising wages, which i thought was kind of something curious. it really is a hideous institution. the state of the union as an institution is horrible. this kind of partisan hackery is reflective of why it s a bad idea. why it is long outlived its moment. and if we get to the point that we re scoring people about how many times they jump up and down like jacks in the box so they can applaud the supreme magistrate of the united states, we are a long way from a madisonian republic. this is a bad instit