is this. i just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more tha we have. fellas, i need 11,000 votes. give me a break. then president trump georgia secretary of state - in order to overturn the election result in that state. the phone call remains shocking, no matter how many times you hear it. but the call was over an hour-long. and there are other parts of that call that prosecutors may now be taking a closer look at for instance, there is thi part so, it did people voted and i think the number is clos to 5000 people and they went to obituaries. they went to all sorts o methods to come up with an accurate number. and a minimum is close to abou 5000 voters. that was president trum insisting, again, to the georgia secretary of state that thousands of dead peopl voted in georgia during th 2020 election. today, the washington post reports that one day befor that infamous phone call, report commissioned by donal trump s own campaign had found that nowhere near 5000 dea
uncovered in multiple federa and state investigations had it s the most damning piece of evidence against donald trum and his ongoing legal battles, remains this phone call. so, look, all i want to d is this. i just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more tha we have. fellas, i need 11,000 votes. give me a break. then president trump, pressuring georgia secretary o state, to find him 11,000 vote in order to overturn the election result in that state. the phone call remains shocking, no matter how many times you hear it. but the call was over an hour-long. and there are other parts of that call that prosecutors may now be taking a closer look at for instance, there is thi part so, dead people voted and i think the number is clos to 5000 people and they went to obituaries. they went to all sorts o methods to come up with an accurate number. and a minimum is close to abou 5000 voters. that was president trum insisting, again, to the georgia secretary of state that t
the fact that evan corcoran, trump s other lawyer - the fact that we are talking about donald trump s lawyers all having - the spotlight, legally, as the former president s the fact that evan corcoran ha been deemed the crime fraud exception ha been invoked in this, what doe that portend for mar-a-lago? i, mean is that going to b meaningful or is evan corcoran just going to plead the fifth if and when he has to testify? well, there s two things. first of all, what it tells me is that they are looking at th obstruction charge because it seems like corcoran s role was between when the first subpoena for those documents went out in may an the documents that turned up i the search warrant because, in between, he ha written a letter to the doj, basically saying, we did a diligent search and we found everything - more - it s not about how the documents got to mar-a-lago in the first place, not tha original crime but was there a cover-up and intentional obstruction plus, just after the
of bringing someone in wit that amount of security, someone who is so high-profile then there are the optics too, right, for the manhattan da office there s a question - how do you manage this histori moment not historic, necessarily, in good way it s very complicated, right what do you think? what are the consideration that you think alvin bragg, th da, needs to make in the context of bringing the firs former president ever in fou criminal charging? so, i m not expecting a purpose perp walk. he s got to be super it tune to them. when someone is charged with a federal crime, they can be arrested, which is the law enforcement officers in this case, the fbi, go to the person, and put him or her in handcuff and take them to the station house in order to be -
s role was between when the first subpoena for those documents went out in may an the documents that turned up i the search warrant because, in between, he ha written a letter to the doj, basically saying, we did a diligent search and we found everything - and then there was more it s not about how the documents got to mar-a-lago in the first place, not tha original crime but was there a cover-up and intentional obstruction of justice after the fact? so that is important because that charge has been floated around now, it seems they are pursuin it, really, all the way to i and. now, if he pleads the fifth, it s interesting because we don t really know that he necessarily ha criminal exposure himself. the crime fraud exception does not mean, all ways - it can mean that the lawyer an the client were conspiring together to commit a crime but it could also just mea that the client was asking his lawyer for advice on how t commit a future crime. and that is not protected by the privile