it has nothing to do with th decisions that she wrote or an of the judgments that she issued, or any of he professional work. it s not to say that it s of limits to questions someone speech or oratory writings outside of third judicia background but to ascribe a negativ intention to it, or but or to scribe of particular viewpoint to it was again, beyond th pale, and completely unjustified. what we saw today was an attempt to assail the characte of ketanji brown jackson because her record itself is s good, they re grasping a straws, they re trying to find some way to make her see unqualified and the failed miserably. may i ask you to stay wit