Credit with our palestinian partners, to do it. In jordan, we worked on their Education System. Weve done that 10 years ago. Currently were working on the refugee capability, health care and education. We know how to transform. So the business or government leader, if somebody can bring you huge benefits that you want, as a track record of being trusted this is an issue for merkel to solve with a bomb. Theyve got to have rules of the road in conduct. Theyve got to resolve it there. You cant put your businesses in between. Its a fitting note here on u. N. Week. Just a few last things. Speaking of heads of state hillary clinton, she came to address your sales meeting at tell us what happened. What was it like . Does she have it . Is she going to get it . Well, it was interesting. Ive had the honor to interview probably 20 heads of states. Ive interviewed her husband probably four times. She didnt want to know the questions ahead of time she gave a good opening comment for about 10 minute
Up to work without getting paid. They all work in your states, these are folks who if they dont have a pay chick will not be paycheck will not be able to spend that money in your states. Will have a direct impact on Americas National security. Lou critics say this is the president s amnesty fiat for Illegal Immigrants that will do the most damage to our economy. That is why Republican Leaders are standing firm. And insisting any dhs funding bill gut the president s executive action on amnesty. For their part, Senate Democrats are filibustering the bill. Tonight, they successfully blocked it for a furth time. Tonight, well talk with one of those fighting the president s order in the court. The attorney general of state of oklahoma scott pruitt. Oklahoma one of 26 state that have sued president to stop him from unilaterally implements amnesty through fiat. And Obama Administration often down plays threats of what they call remnants of al qaeda, they are trying to excite the American Publ
Signed, john a. Boehner, speaker of the house of representatives. The speaker pro tempore the chair will alternative recognition between the parties with each party limited to one hour and each member other than the majority and minority leaders and minority whip limited to five minutes, but in no event shall debate continue beyond 1 50 p. M. The chair recognizes the gentleman from oregon, mr. Blumenauer. Five minutes. Mr. Blumenauer thank you, mr. Speaker. There are a lot of talk of cliffs here in our nations capital. We have fiscal cliffs that we faced with the debt ceiling. There was the sequestration cliff. We had obviously the cliff surrounding the government shutdown. This week we face a Homeland Security cliff. Where because our republican friends have been unable to Reach Agreement and they have held hostage the budget of the department of Homeland Security, we face a situation where well either shut down those operations or hopefully people will come to their senses and take a
People said, want to see this. Does anybody think that what happened in the republican nomination process in 2012 was helpful . Why do we want to replicate that . At a financial disadvantage. Some of the richest people in the money to that in the world split their money. This is an advanced community. Some people did not go far enough. The president criticize them all their money they get to the republicans. We have to save our money. Marriage the context is not a good idea. I think we should unite behind her. [applause] well, thank you very much a testament to your own career. This perception was a problem. The candidacy. The fact that he had zero negative effect. Ready for the couple. Sending out. Thank you [applause] you were watching booktv in prime time. A reminder every week in booktv features 48 hours of nonfiction books beginning at 8 a. M. Eastern on saturday. We invite you to find and like like is online at facebook. Com booktv. Coming up live on cspan2 a look at the experien
The definition gets cloudier not more specific in my view. And in fact, you know, if we end somewhere like three out of the seven, that would be clear too, wouldnt it . Wouldnt it be just as clear to say navigable waters are waters that are navigable for interstate commerce and why wouldnt that be we have been the area that lacks clarity right now is not the issue of navigable waters. The Supreme Court actually spoke very definitively that navigable waters need to be looked at in a way that isnt the traditional definition. We havent been looking at navigable waters the same way. It is a recognition that navigable waters in their ability to provide the functions that we look for, are really severely impacted by the waters that flow into them. So the challenge we tried to face in the clean water rule was to take a look at how do we identify those rivers streams tributaries, wetlands that feed into those navigable waters that we need to understand and protect so that they wont degrade tho