find out they are pregnant. juan: kimberly, the people who are pro-choice say wait a second. where are you going with this? there was a bill being considered in congress, and you have republican saying that the minute you have a heart beat, the heartbeat constitutes life. juan: kimberly: i would se law in the state of texas as it stands for this woman and her children and her unborn child was murdered is fertilization to actual birth is considered a life. juan: is that right? kimberly: correct. in texas, twice the texas court of appeals has upheld this for double homicide. a murder conviction for a man who killed a pregnant woman and her unborn child. dana s hypothetical, if the woman had driven across state lines and was killed by a drunk driver where it was not honored, then it would be church that way. juan: one of the things
appeared to be a clear case of police misconduct but the texas court of appeals, which has final say, agreed with the trial court. finally, organizing for action employee ethan krupp has gained notoriety and his own hash tag as bath amma boy. bush feed noticed he posted critical comments about president obama in his defunct college blog. in it he wrote a imaginary blog about the speech at university of madison university, between mbom, my obama party. he quotes a section of the president s speech and then fights with himself over it. krupp bashes the president for lofty rhetoric, letting mitt romney scoring points for politicizing the bin laden raid and more. the fan boy side says things like greatest president ever. today s press conference, a lot of questions that question
correspondent. texas appeals court has overturned money laundry conviction. a former house majority leader tom delay. acquittal means delay cannot be retried. money laundering case over. delay convicted in november 2010 for illegally funneling $190,000 in corporate money through the republican national committee to help elect gop candidates to the texas legislature in 2012 actually 2002. delay was sentenced to prison on conspiracy charge and five years for money laundering, remains free while appealing his case. texas court of appeals appealed 2-1 there was not enough evidence to sustain the convictions. [ female announcer ] we lowered her fever.
hair, and the texas court of appeals had ruled 3-2 that you couldn t execute or even sustain this conviction unless that hair is the independent corroborating evidence. well, a few months ago, the innocence project and the texas observer, we were able to get a dna test on that hair that demonstrated that it did not come from claude jones, it came from the victim, and that means, legally, there was legally insufficient evidence to sustain that conviction. and what s extraordinary about it is the president didn t even know. bush didn t even know that this request had been made. and then, of course, there s the case that i hope you will be covering as the president campaign continues, and that s of cameron todd willingham. i heard you spoke of that earlier tonight. there s so much there. we do know this. that if we did not have the death penalty in this country, only, we wouldn t be in this situation tonight. we ll find out if this is a turning point for this country
it s extortion. by the way, this just in she hasn t eat even in a week because she heard about four unpaid parking tickets. megyn: [laughter] megyn: the law out there in the texas court of appeals can be that there can be circumstances where you would have a duty to speak, a duty to disclose in the course of a hiring decision, or, you know, hiring and the beginning of an employment situation, arthur, but my question to you is, could that apply when you re talking about disclosure of one s extramarital affairs, one personal life? i mean can you imagine the position this is going to put employers in? you re telling me anybody out there, all they have to do is go to their job interview and say, and i just want to make sure that this is a moral, christian place to work, what is the employer going to say it s not really, i don t think it is. and if they say anything other than that you can sue if somebody is having an extramarital affair. with the greatest respect, your honor h. good lu