in this case, there are two opposing decisions. what do we do at that point? we have another step in between. the district court and the supreme court. that s the circuit court. you have heard a lot of discussion about the washington case being taken to the ninth circuit court of appeals. that s our appellate court out on the west coast. there is another appellate court. there are many of them, one that covers massachusetts and states in the northeast. that s the first circuit. you could have two inconsistent decision frs tho decisions from those courts and that s when the supreme court takes it up. it is great to see that some of the executive agencies despite the rhetoric from the president this morning had decided to follow this so-called judge s order and stop right now. give the court in washington time to wade through these constitutional arguments, issue a final decision on the merits and then take it up to the ninth circuit. let that play out at the ninth circuit. what concer
does it look like? i was able to obtain this homeland security threat assessment that was done months ago and it talks about the evolving threat of terrorism within the united states and it breaks it down in three ways. it says that there are essentially three different threats streams, traditional threat stream which came out of the tribal areas of pakistan, people went there to train and then went off to their countries to dairy out these attack, second threat stream is from the al-qaeda affiliates, we ve seen these plots launched from places like yemen, we ve also seen the growth of al-qaeda in somalia, and then the third is this home grown element, individuals, as it s alleged in the texas case, who are self radicalized. the important thing that that document is trying to emphasize is that there s been an americanization within al-qaeda, americans have taken on more senior leadership positions. we ve seen that in yemen, we ve also seen that in somalia, and we ve seen it tradition