Just to give you some sense of it, in very large jurisdiction of the United States, the rate of recidivism for criminal offenders can be as high as 50 or more. When i. C. E. Can come in and remove offenders from a Given Community so that they cant reoffend, guess what . We take the recidivism rate to zero. So, for example, if you 100 criminal offenders, get them out, that is 50 crimes that will not happen over the next three years as a result of our enforcement efforts. Do you agree with former director morton as to the power of security working in the . Well, i dont believe we should scrap secure communities. I believe given the reality where we all with this program in this country that we need a fresh start. We have mayors and governors signing executive orders and passing laws that limit our ability to effectively carry out this program. I think the goal of the program is a very worthy one that needs to continue. So as part of the overall effort im embarked in right now i want a fr
Question. Away daca works, theres an individual assessment of whether or not a person can be in the Program Based on a background check, based on the particulars of that persons situation. As the clock has turned yellow, do you agree or disagree that it produces and results in groups or classes of people . There is a class of people who are eligible for the daca program, but theyve got to go through a background check for criminal history. I i think thats about right. It could be very confusing. Impressions can be created that may not be accurate. For example, it was stated think by the chairman that the committee had learned and 20s1,en 2008 i. C. E. Declined to taken against 160,000 people who were arrested by enforcementsl law and agencies. Now, the Nonpartisan Congressional Research Service produced the subpoena and provided us with a report. Analysis,ing to their more than 60 of those people permanent residents of the United States. They couldnt be removed until they were convicte