things unconsciously while asleep. he detailed the battery of tests reitz had been given, which showed his propensity to sleepwalking. is it a fake? no, no, no. when you re in that rem sleep, there s no way you can fake it. the trial lasted three weeks. and now the jury would have to decide if it was conscious rage or unconscious tragedy. guilty or not? i was extremely worried and scared because what then? what happens then? if he s innocent, because he was sleepwalking, how do you go on? how do you move on after that? the jury was out for a day and a half. and then we the jury find the defendant stephen reitz guilty of murder. the jury rejected the science. didn t buy the data and tests that show a link between
her too firmly. she even went to a doctor, said reitz, to ask why she bruised so easily. as for the night she was killed, reitz s attorney ted veganes said stephen couldn t have known what he was doing, couldn t have been that angry. there is nothing that occurred that makes sense. the act itself is bizarre. the act itself is an act of somebody losing it. and then the heart of the defense. the medical expert from stanford university explained how people can and sometimes do, violent things unconsciously while asleep. he detailed the battery of tests reitz had been given, which showed his propensity to sleepwalking. is it a fake? no, no, no. when you re in that rem sleep, there s no way you can fake it. the trial lasted three weeks. and now the jury would have to decide if it was conscious rage or unconscious tragedy. guilty or not?