happened to those individuals who were, you know in wheelchairs, the elderly sni understand a woman cracked her head, an elderly senior citizen, that a girl, someone broke her ankle or a foot was hanging from her leg. did you see this? i did. i saw the i felt bad for the young children, babies who you know were on limited supply of diapers. i also heard they were rationing out diapers on board. the elderly were stuck whenever they were at. it was no, no way of getting anywhere and people just bringing them food. all right. michael i m going to go you. you represent matt. what is the basis of the claim? can you expect to recover given the fact that you know there is limited liability
happened to those individuals who were, you know in wheelchairs, the elderly sni understand a woman cracked her head, an elderly senior citizen, that a girl, someone broke her ankle or a foot was hanging from her leg. did you see this? i did. i saw the i felt bad for the young children, babies who you know were on limited supply of diapers. i also heard they were rationing out diapers on board. the elderly were stuck whenever they were at. it was no, no way of getting anywhere and people just bringing them food. all right. michael i m going to go you. you represent matt. what is the basis of the claim? can you expect to recover given the fact that you know there is limited liability
personally for the ticket sndz. first, good evening, your honor good, to see you. thanks for having me back. matt and other passengers have a right to file a claim. it s a combination of a negligent inflix of emotional distress claim and intentional intention of emotional distress claim. they re difficult. you need to show physical jirks don t you? for people suffering stress walking through feces-encrusted campit that is he megsal trauma. is that recoverable? it is, judge. and you re correct talking about the zone of danger test. in some jurisdictions it does require a physical man festation. from what i ve seen these people have a right to recover under the law for negligent inflix of emotional distress. do you think this was intentional? why? i do.
personally for the ticket sndz. first, good evening, your honor good, to see you. thanks for having me back. matt and other passengers have a right to file a claim. it s a combination of a negligent inflix of emotional distress claim and intentional intention of emotional distress claim. they re difficult. you need to show physical jirks don t you? for people suffering stress walking through feces-encrusted campit that is he megsal trauma. is that recoverable? it is, judge. and you re correct talking about the zone of danger test. in some jurisdictions it does require a physical man festation. from what i ve seen these people have a right to recover under the law for negligent inflix of emotional distress. do you think this was intentional?
day i saw her. no emotion that. is why. i think she s morally insane. i m not going there yet. alexis, you ve been in the courtroom. how does she come across? as just meek little girl that has been so tortured i ve spoken to travis s friend met her and they say this is nothing what she s like in real life. she s acting and pretending. she was outgoing, bubbley, vie vaishus now this is a show, they said she s acting and they said she can tell she hesitates when she talks. she is trying to think of the story. she hasn t raised a fact in her testimony making justification claim. what was that line if i raped you?. that was during okay. but it s not okay. but it doesn t make out a self-defense claim a imminent threat of harm. he was stabbed, shot, slashed