t that s a very fair statement. james colmer, thank you for being with us. appreciate it. here with reaction, fox news lega l analyst gregg jarrett, former senior trump adviser stephen miller. walls are closing in, aren tr they? they are. there s alreaden ty more thancrn enough evidence to bring a criminal case against biden for bribery. influence peddling definedned in in the bribery statute. 18 u.s.c. 201 as briberyhe and know he s aiding and abetting his son. he s an accessorybettin. he is a beneficiary and a beneficiary. but you don e is at even have tr to prove that he s a beneficiary. again, read the statut ie. if the money goes to another person or entitys , it is stilll bribery. devon archer made it abundantl ytl clear that joe biden was not biw only involved but they were selling access to and promises of influencess and, runningnd protection for burisma. you know, get your runni dad
gotten a call when hunter was in dubai with burisma executives? what did huntewith burisma exerr the money? what did the grandchildren do for the money? do we have any specific detailfs of what helped earn them millions of dollars? welhel, devon archer is very clear why hunter biden was being paid by burisma. it was bei was to buy them proth the brand was going to make iten so that no one would mess dev with them. that s what devin archer said. they were buying protectioon an from viktor shokin. and when viktor shokin, the prosecutor, didn twheno follow the plan, he started to escalate the investigation. that s when thingsestigati got o and i think next week we ll be able to make public a lot of new emails. ke publiyou re going to see what happened. did joe biden really carry out u.s.d jo policy or did he change u.s. policy when he fired shokin? we re going to give you thatpolf answer next week. we got a lot of new documents. we re putting together, are new timeline. these are going