mind. can he convince the senate that he was acting in the best interest of the united states, he was worried corruption in ukraine. might that lead to his common ration? i think it would. might there be his test defense to own this, i was so worried that u.s. tax dollars would be squandered in a corrupt engagement. the opposite of good faith is bad faith. it defend ons what senators believe was his motive. he can try to make the good faith defense, but if they think other than he loses that