Morning in case 20 39 39, trump versus United States. Mr. Sour . Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court, without president ial immunity from criminal prosecution, there can be no presidency as we know it. For 234 years of american history, no president was ever prosecuted for his official act. The framers of our constitution viewed an energetic executive as essential to securing liberty. If a president can be charged, put on trial and in prison for his most controversial decision as soon as he leaves office, that looming threat will distort the president s decisionmaking precisely when bold and fearless action is most needed. Every current president will face de facto blackmail and extortion by his political rivals while he is still in office. The implications of the courts decision here extend far beyond the facts of this case. Could president george w. Bush have been sent to prison for obstructing an official proceeding or allegedly lying to congress to induce war in iraq . Co
Prosecuted for his official act. The framers of our constitution viewed an energetic executive as essential to securing liberty. If a president can be ard, put on trial and in prison for his most controversi dision as soon as he leaves office, that looming teawill distort the president s decisionmaking precisely when bold and fearless action is most needed. Every current president will face de facto blackml d extortion by his political rivals while he is still in office. The implications of the courts decision here extend far beyond the facts of ts se. Could esent george w. Bush have been sent to prison for stcting an official proceeding or allegedly lying to congress to induce war iir . Could president obama be charged with murder for killing u. S. Citizens abroad by drone strike . Could President Biden someday be chgewith unlawfully inducing immigrants to enter the country illegally for his border poly. The answer to all the questions is no. Prosecuting the esent for official acts is
Imal prosecution, there can be no presidency as we know. For 234 years ofmecan history, no president was ever prosecuted for h oicial act. The framers of our constitution viedn energetic executive as essential to securing liberty. If a president can be charged, put on trial and in prison f his most controversial decision as soon as he leaves office, that looming threat will distort the president s decisionmaking precisely when bold and fearless action is mo nded. Every currt esident will face de facto blackmail and tortion by his political rivals while he is still i office. E implications of the courts decision here extend fareyd the facts of this case. Could president george w. Bush have been sent to prison for obstructing an official proceedi oallegedly lying to congress to induce war in iraq . Could president obama be charged with murder for killinu. Citizens abroad by drone strike . Could President Biden someday be charged with unlawfully inducing immigran tenter the country illega
The Us Supreme Court or historic arguments are about to unfold testing former president Donald Trumps unprecedented claim of absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for his attempts to overturn his 2020 election defeat. The hub couldnt determine if the Presumptive Republican president ial nominees federal election subversion trial happens before this year is 2024. Election or at all . Im Kaitlan Collins outside of the high court and im Anderson Cooper over looking at Manhattan Criminal Courthouse while the Supreme Court hears trumps Immunity Case the former president is here in New York City in the midst of His First Criminal Trial For Hush Money Scheme allegedly aimed at helping his 2016 president ial campaign the leadoff witness, former National Enquirer executive david pecker resumes his testimony soon, recovering. Both of these monumental cases in the hours ahead. Im jake tapper in washington and this is cnn Special Coverage, the trump Immunity Battle at the Us Supreme Court ab
Thessue in this case collection of this information is a search as it disturbs peoples longstanding practical expectations that their longstanding actions will remain private. You want ushe rule to adopt in this case assuming we keep a miller, miller and smith versus maryland on the book. The role we seek is longerterm aggregations of cell phone is a search and requires a warrant. We are not asking the court to overturn those cases. We think the lesson to be john is that any the lesson to be drawn is that any extension of predigital to this digital data how would you distinguish miller . Miller requires more limited that it was voluntarily conveyed and words created by the passing of instruments in the stream of commerce to transfer funds. What we have here is more sensitive and less voluntary. Why is it more sensitive . Why is cell site Location Information more sensitive than bank records, which particularly today, when a lot of people do not use cash much, a bank record will disclos