minimal, they are willing to take a chance and terrorizing, traumatizing, and communities, law enforcement working diligently to combat this. we want to get help from the justice system. carley: jen psaki was asked about smash and grab robberies because of the pandemic. anything to that? some issues with the pandemic. outdoor mask wearing those create an atmosphere, with can seal your identity, that is a hurdle to identify those. carley: don t think that is -
could not prove it and the years past but the detriment effective was about to take a new look at an old clue and turn this clue from cold to red hot. once again, here s andrea canning with the killing in cobb county. after ten years in prison, was seem decor was a free man, but still a suspect in the murder of carmen smith and the stabbing of her son nick. he was still terrorizing you in some ways. just the fact that he was out was kind of terrorizing. he is that character in those horror movies. he s like your worst nightmare. after his release he got a job and moved to suburban atlanta. he was a freeman and enjoying life. here he is sky diving and loving it. daker s freedom galled homicide
because of the defendents dropping their phones in toilets and without a doubt, this is an incredibly ambitious civil trial this isn t a criminal trial and the intention here is to smoke out to these people were, what they were planning, and most importantly who was the financing them and to really lay down a marker to say, you don t get to come to a town, essentially invade a town, with the intention of harming and maiming and burning and terrorizing and then sail off and say it was just free speech. even though it s incredibly complicated trial and a heavy lift, and emotionally, incredibly difficult for these plaintiffs who are reliving it, i do think it will be consequential if only to do the thing that this happened so rarely in the last couple years which is find accountability and level
justice grind very very slowly, this trial and the delays, the endless delays partly because the defendants were dropping their phones in toilets and refusing to comply with discovery, but yeah, i think on balance without a doubt, this is an incredibly ambitious, as you said, it s a civil trial. this isn t a criminal trial, and the intention here is to smoke out who these people were, what they were planning, maybe most importantly, who was financing them, and to really, i think, lay down a marker to say you don t get to come to a town essentially invade a town with the intention of harming and maiming and burning and terrorizing and then sail off and say it was just free speech. and so even though it s an incredibly complicated trial and a heavy lift, i think, and emotionally incredibly difficult for these brave plaintiffs who