is it because they cling to this fiction that they are not really media companies when in fact, they are among the most powerful media companies on earth. there are two parts but i think the first answer is that is just so much of it that the sheer scale of the contest, the number of content uploaded every second to youtube, the amount coming think about the 2 billion people using facebook. it is just so much actually it is very difficult to police that you know using automated means because even though we hear a lot these days about artificial intelligence and machine learning and natural language processing where computers try to understand the meaning of different words and trying that you understand what is going on. actually, all that is still in its infancy. so to police the content for example, to spark terrorist
example, to spark terrorist plotting or child abuse.those sorts of things. actually it is pretty difficult. again if you do this manually, it costs you needed to employ not just tens of thousands but hundreds of thousands of people. that would be their argument. is about money! they do not want to spend the money. i guess facebook will not hire another 10,000 fact checkers. you talk about these companies from the left in the right ear twitter will now remove the blue verification for prominent people if in twitters judgment does people post hateful or racist messages. you get into that you start attacking politicians, is that hateful? can they come under fire for exercising that judgment? but you say these companies are perceived as being run by liberals. i think is a big issue be one of the arguments that you hear a lot from the right particularly is that the double
evaluated intelligence and real concerns that i had about terrorist plotting. make no mistake, our enemies are constantly working to find new methods for disguising explosives, recruiting insiders, and hijacking aircraft. i ve made a point to talk with everyone i can about securing aviation. i ve met with our international partners, i ve met with our industry leaders, i ve met with our private sector stakeholders. my conclusion is this. it is time that we raise the global baseline of aviation security. we cannot play international whack a mole with each new threat. instead, we must put in place new measures across the board to keep the traveling public safe and make it harder for terrorists to succeed. today, i am announcing a first step toward this goal by requiring new security measures to be applied to all commercial flights coming into the united states from abroad. these measures will be both seen and unseen, and they will be phased in over time. they will include enhanced
going forward, these are three separate cells, they re like needles in the proverbial haystack, they re difficult to find, even if you find them, in the west we can t arrest people for thought. if we think they might be up to something, that s not good enough. we have to have the resources to follow it before something like happened last night. we know there were seven people arrested in the manchester attack and 12 people after this attack. there was that other attack that happened on westminster bridge in march. what s going on in the united kingdom, all these attacks happening in such a close amount of time and multiple people involved? that s right. there s already been a surge in isis and inspired terrorist plotting in the uk. there have been five thwarted attacks, plots since the westminster attack.
like that, the fact of how close they can get, a lot of people, how sure are they, determining the location and timing, they were doing it because they knew they would have maximum damage. that part of it is the identification of the site is fairly standard in terms of terrorist plotting. that part is not a surprise. am i 5, mi 6, manchester police, a great deal of experience in all of this, the contact that i have got, they know who the