keep their pie holes shot and it s okay because there s no consequenc consequences, sure, you create anonymous sources. so it s interesting. the new york times came out with a nonsensical brief statement saying it s none of our doing. the fact that the british authorities are completely spun up over this. you know, we handled this in a responsible manner. well, you know, again, nonsensical. i don t want to say the new york times might have willingly, knowingly possibly compromised or disrespected to some degree an ongoing terrorist investigation in the hopes of perhaps taking another shot at the trump administration. but yes, i am saying that. yes. so that s a possibility. neil: you said that statement on your own there. mike, thanks very much. to mike s point, so much we don t know and whether this was
of a few minutes ago would suggest something bigger, something perhaps more sinister than police.the police here would ve set up a command headquarters in manchester. it ll be saying police officers organizing this investigation now, monitoring it is a major incident and terrorism will be high up that list of suspicions now given the scale of fatalities and wouldn t would imagine the scale of the injure injured. just a bit more detail as we piece together what will now be a terrorist investigation, the chronology and geography, this statement is for manchester arena, the call the venue itself saying there was concern as they were leaving the rio grande show. not much we knew. the incident took place outside the venue in a public space. we have believe that the
that this might ve been a suicide bombing and i certainly don t want to pass those on without evidence but a number of british publications are reporting that. did you hear from any other eyewitnesses that that is possibly true? i m just watching the news now, only just started using the word terrorist. and went to this incident and then fatalities. now saying terrorist. tucker: we don t know that either. either. authorities are calling a terrorist investigation that appears to be the operating assumption and of course, it would be. he said it was your first thought. this is something that you worry about in manchester? my partner laughs at me because i would say we ve got chopping, i was look around that exits and stuff just because
conduct of a terrorist investigation, but because of a typo in the law, the fbi has not been allowed access to internet meta data and national security cases to the extent that is necessary can you talk to us about the importance of that particular fix, the electronic communications fix? thank you so much, senator. this seems like a boring deal and it makes a big impact on our work and here s why. in the counter terrorism cases and counterintelligence cases we can issue with all kinds of layers of approval in the fbi a national security letter to find out the subscriber to a particular telephone number and to find out what numbers that telephone number was in contact with. not the content of those communications, but just the connection. again, because of what i believe is a typo in the law and if i m wrong, congress will tell me that they intended this, the companies that provide the same
conduct of a terrorist investigation, but because of a typo in the law, the fbi has not been allowed access to internet metadata in national security cases, to the extent that is necessary. can you talk to us about the importance of that particular fix, the electronic communications transactional records fix? thank you so much, senator. this seems like a boring deal. this makes a big impact on our work. here s why. in our counterterrorism cases and our counterintelligence cases, we can issue with all kinds of layer of approval in the fbi, a national security letter to find out the subscriber to a particular telephone number and find out what numbers that telephone number was in contact with. not the content of the communications, but just the connection. again, because of what i believe is a typo in the law, and if i m wrong, congress will tell me they intended this, the companies that provide the same services but on the internet