claim, this is group. because sweden is not a country with a terrorism problem. stay with me. you re not following me now. by the way, i m not talking about terrorism or not terrorism. i m talking about a factual assertion of any kind being made by the president of the united states. don t you think that the president of the united states making a factual assertion should actually be referencing facts? of course he should. and the most important fact is this, even if this group is 10,000 latin-american mother theresas, that still doesn t mean it is okay and right for them to demand entry, to break and enter into our country and demand of us entry into our country. that is wrong. it s an abuse of the united states. and here s why borders are important. okay, i lock my doors at night not because i hate those on the outside but because i love those on the inside. the same is true for a country. we control our borders because
who is this kid? what was going on in the house? pardon me for my voice. there s a mental health epidemic here being confused for gun problem. i don t want that to sound political but it is the truth. where were the parents? where was the home life of this child? not only do we have a mental health problem but a terrorism problem in this country. check the bags, open the jackets, we train the security, invest in individual security guard to predict behavior. 21 different red flags, about to commit an act of murder, you can train them in that to spend the money on training. a big school, 3200 students, went on to say adding armed guards and back checks are the first steps toward securing schools but he admits those guards also need another level of training to be able to predict behavior of potentially
look at. those people ended up being permanent residents and criminals. we have to find a common ground. i think it s a little delusional to believe that if we did have some bipartisan movement on the immigration stuff, that some of these issues could be resolved easily. the problem i have is you just really have to be delusional to believe that even if we fixed all of these programs e, we would be safe from terrorism. the threat is still there. the random acts of violence that take place on a daily or weekly basis all over the world is still there. just focusing on these bureaucratic machinations of how people get in and out of the country. i don t think it is a strategic way or approach to solving our terrorism problem. dana: it certainly isn t partisan in any way. i also think i wonder about okay. so if you deal with chain migration going forward, that might be a good and useful thing to do. what do you do for people who come here, like the terrorists
good. brian: he didn t say all muslims were bad. he said these two extremist groups. juan: when you retweet something like that. jesse: re-tweeting is not an endorsement, juan. brian: the mayor of london wants theresa may to rescind the invitation the president accepted. we don t have a date yet for the visit, because of this. she says they are doing just fine. i say, if theresa may got video of the bike path terrorist and tweeted that out and said hey, theresa may, hey president trump, cracked down on your terrorism problem in new york city, how would president trump have handled it? dana: there s a few things. the extremist groups here is britain first. that s the extremist group.
name of trying to prevent this next strategy. why don t we have a right to own a gun, but not ten guns? you said that we should but hold on, could this be an inflection point? to mike s point, you know, there s a lot of people who like to own these guns and strap one on. could this be a moment where they say, enough is enough? look, the inflection point should have been sandy hook five years ago. the inflection point should have been las vegas four or five weeks ago. we ve reached a point where we re becoming numb to the steadiness of this horror. and that s a genuine that s a genuine cultural problem, that half the country simply is saying, well, that s the price we pay for freedom, right? they would never say that, by the way, but extending civil liberties to terrorists or habeas corpus rights to terrorists on guantanamo because that s a terrorism problem. then they make this civil libertarian argument that i think sits strangely with the reality that tens of thousands of