about losing even more of the ground in the narrative, that is expanding across the middle east, and the iranians are the sponsor of this axis of resistance. and was probably concerning to viewers is they ve got this thing where, let s just understand that a lot of this has to do with this whole idea of the resistance against the west, pushing the united states out of the middle east, and who gets to run and own that mission, so this is, to me, a bit of a competition and isis is trying to grab back, if you will pay i want to see what you think about something that the israeli prime minister said, because he has told the u.s. that israel is committed to bringing fundamental change on its border with lebanon. his
are both taking questions from iowa voters tonight in back to back cnn events. our town halls moderated by caitlin collins and aaron burnett and it starts in just a few hours at 9:00 eastern. it infamous terror group claims is responsible for two explosions in iran that killed more than 100 people. healthy involvement of isis could stoke more tensions in an already volatile region.
India News: A team of Uttar Pradesh anti-terrorist squad (ATS) visited a village in the Aurangabad district of Maharashtra on Wednesday in connection with some an
this is america reports. nation s highest court has now determined that twitter was not responsible when third party content was posted on its platform by the terror group isis. john: and side stepping on a case against google that would narrow section 230, that is the federal law protect big tech from lawsuits arising from content posted by users. sandra: and it all comes as lawmakers try to make significant reforms to the liability shield. accusing big tech as an excuse to unfairly censor content. john: shannon bream has been watching all the goings on at the court. big win for twitter, unanimous decision of the supreme court, case brought by the family of a man killed in a 2017 isis terror attack. they had argued twitter was at fault for allowing isis to post content on its platform and they sued under the anti-terrorism act. during arguments that lasted
nearly three hours, it really sounded like the conservative and liberal justices, they seemed a bit split about this, whether twitter should bear any responsibility for hosting terror-related content. in the opinion, authored by justice thomas, they were united. found the plaintiffs didn t have a case. plaintiffs had failed to allege that defendants intentionally provided any substantial aid to the attack or otherwise consciously participated in it. much less assisted isis to render them liable for every isis attack. aclu saying twitter and other apps are home to an immense amount of protected speech and it would be devastating if those platforms related to censorship to avoid a deluge over the users posts. the court did not get to the big question that folks on both sides of the social media debate want answered, what about