idea is creeping into the american debate, too. the new york times this morning a story on this very issue we re talking about by two reporters contains the following sentence. this is a news report saying the american constitutions offers robust protections for american speech. so there s a provision in the constitution, i think it s called the first amendment, that says congress shall make no law against racist speech. what kind of mentality? the new york times pretexted by enumerable first amendment speeches and where justice brennan called for uninhibited robust, ride open debate. the new york times acting if this is a legitimate criticism. it s amazing. martha: thanks very much, ambassador bolton. thank you. martha: another low for the terror group isis as they use
frankly, these attacks are becoming more and more common that i think it s harder to get people focused on them and to feel like there s a sense of urgency because they have become normal. what i thought was interesting, striking about this, the way president trump reacted. it was a tempered response. it was a statement saying he had spoken to the prime minister, theresa may, and that we would as a nation stand with britain. but it wasn t automatically pointing to radical islamic terrorism like it was pointing right to isis, as he showed at some points during the campaign. i think either that was reined in by some of his advisors, a more tempered approach. james: very measured and very presidential. the president also commented today on the extraordinary allegation unschooled by the
scotland yard fairly firm and its conclusion. has all the hallmarks. comes on the one-year anniversary of the brussels attacks. looks a lot like, in-kind, like the attacks and nice, the attack at ohio state. the big question will be, is this isis inspired? is it potentially isis directed? what we learned about that? part of a network, part of a broader network? have they communicated, had he communicated with others about the attack? was there planning, what are the ties to transnational terrorist groups? we want those questions answered quickly. james: other stories with event tracking but quickly, david, does an event like this have the potential to perhaps change the way people view these executive orders on immigration by president trump? it may in the short span but news moves so fast that, and
this point. california man may enact policy other states have introduced bills to penalize sanctuary cities financially. mississippi became the first state to pass such a bill. trump administration claims that sanctuary policies are illegal and vowed to withhold millions and federal funds. we expect a statement from the department of justice tomorrow. a spokes man at homeland security told me they are trying to come up with what level of noncompliance defines a sanctuary city. james: william la jeunesse in los angeles. syrian arab fighters looking to evict a terror group isis from the city of raqqa have the deployed enemy lines deployed behind enemy lines. coalition spokesman said
policy other states have introduced bills to penalize sanctuary cities financially. mississippi became the first state to pass such a bill. trump administration claims that sanctuary policies are illegal and vowed to withhold millions and federal funds. we expect a statement from the department of justice tomorrow. a spokes man at homeland security told me they are trying to come up with what level of noncompliance defines a sanctuary city. james: william la jeunesse in los angeles. syrian arab fighters looking to evict a terror group isis from the city of raqqa have the deployed enemy lines deployed behind enemy lines. coalition spokesman said