People do once they get here and people who are more likely to succeed will get preference and those who are less likely to succeed divulge. Whats wrong with that . Took a very important points. The first is that the United States is not a company, its not a school, its a nation. Second point, we want to make sure that we scrutinize every person coming here into the country, we want to make sure that they dont have any terrorist background, we want to make sure they dont have a violent criminal record. No one disputes that. Lets get to this point, very important, the United Nations ws created mainly in the declaration of independence because the kings restricted immigration, because the king of england said states, colonies, you can no longer bring people from other countries. What happened . American revolution, a beautiful idea of this nation came about. Tucker [laughs] the American Revolution was spurred okay. [laughs]
okay. Lets back up a little bit. You said that the two standards
okay. let s back up a little bit. you said that the two standards we need to apply our people aren t terrorists and they don t have a criminal record. would you apply those standards in your own life to anything? i will hire this person, let them into my school, married this person, just as long as this person doesn t have a terror background or a criminal record. shouldn t we aim a little bit higher than that a if we really care about the country? of course. we want to have standards but at the same time, what made this great nation is what we have seen in the statue of liberty, give me your poor, huddled masses. your ancestors came here when they were poor. many and stressors, the founding fathers came here when they were poor. you are successful fox news host. tucker: you are kind of missing it. we are not in the 18th century now and if you really care about the country, he would think deeply about what s going to make it better and safer and more prosperous, happier, more cohes
shooter. and about any ties that he may or may not have had. governor andrea mitchell here. we re told he had no terror background. he was not on anybody s watch list. are we in a situation where every military installation, every navy recruitment center even a strip mall like this is so heavily guarded? well i think you re talking about a fear that people have whether any kind of mass incident like this happens. you know, now we have another location to be to be concerned about. ultimately, the u.s. military will have to make those calls about what are the protocols they re going to put in place to make sure it may protect their the people serving in that way. it is awfully early to try to come to a new conclusion about that. are you focused squarely on the investigation? how you are managing the
online, et cetera, to determine that full extent of his communication and his circle. secondly, they re looking backwards. they re looking at who he was, who where he may have traveled and why. what was his motivation? how was he in fact inspired? those things are both happening simultaneously. and it is happening with the full resources of the fbi and other partners in the federal government. all right. shawn henry, thank you so much. we appreciate it. you talk to retired head of the fbi who told you that if you knew all the intel he saw, you wouldn t be able to sleep at night. that it s coming in from all angles. of course we re in new era that is even more frightening here. we have a shooter that had no known terror background, no known terror connections, maybe something comes up later. but the lean wolf presents an even more frightening challenge for our government.
that would have acquitted him. in 2012larrants and his platoon were in afghanistan when he ordered troops to shoot and kill two afghan men he believed to have terrorists. now there s new evidence that suggest they did have terror background and larrants is seeking clemency. coming up we will speem exclusively to his mother. today a federal appeals court will reconsider a decision forcing youtube to take down an antimuslim film which sparked violent riots in the middle east. earlier this year a three-judge panel ruled in favor of a woman who had a minor role in the film. she claims she was never told the movie was about religion and received several death threats as a result. youtube was forced to remove the film and is fighting back claiming infringement on their first