implicate will be a time consuming task for him. he did a seven year stint on the he is someone used to doing with these kinds of sensitive materials. . he was a person performed by the trump team and the only person that the justice department also agreed on, so this is the only name that both sides are in agreement over being the special master in this. jennifer, in the judges order tonight, she is raising doubts about whether all the documents are classified are actually classified. you say the judges reasoning so, do you think that does she have reason to suggest that this is indefensible. is up for debate whether they re ossified or not? well, that is what, you said don, with nothing behind, it she got one from the government that talks about the classified documents, and how they will be irreparably harmed if they cannot be utilized the. she did not get any evidence from the trump team all socially has one piece of evidence and that is all she has to rule on an
privilege here, why these documents are classified. so there is precedent? there is. but she hasn t grappled with, the chessington illegal analysis, she says i m not buying what the doj selling despite the facts and evidence, and i want to do it for trump i want you to jump in here, because the special master has can you talk about the judges rule or do you think i find that really what i say comical about national security stuff, i spent my life doing, it but this is comical. let me explain why when you look at the classified documents, use our cover sheet in that famous fbi search, take the cover seat off and that is expose the real documents. the header on the top and bottom of the document as a classification. for example, top secure code word, tell keyhole, some of the words and phrases that you would see in a document gathered at mar-a-lago. this question about what the documents are classified or not, i learned to read and fifth great, don. when in says top secret, c