directly, injected in there to work with wikileaks to essentially steal an learn selection, put in an obsequious. i wanted this to be a conspiracy theory, it s listening to job bolton. he has not listened to the kashoki type haven t. i haven t risenned to us, i guess i should ask you, what do you think he should. how many people in this room speak arabic? . if they were speaking korean, i wouldn t leern for. so you dant. everybody uhre back, what are you going to get on and they ve given us the substance of what s in it. i ll hear television say, what about. we re wanting to hear at least the atmospherics and, whether or not there is a language you re absolutely right.
wouldn t leern for. so you dant. everybody uhre back, what are you going to get on and they ve given us the substance of what s in it. i ll hear television say, what about. we re wanting to hear at least the atmospherics and, whether or not there is a language you re absolutely right. i ve spent a lot of time in secret aelgs of, but on other languages in mission i was
intense, that everyone is toogn afraid to ask real questions? oh, it s terrible. you had it will burn today on television say that it s sexist to appoint a woman lawyer. she would have said it was sexist to appoint a male lawyer. you need a gender neutral robot now to cross examine if you want to avoid claims of sexism, it s a no win. cross-examination must be effective and it must be tough.n it has to be respectful. you can be respectful and tough but do not pull punches. there is so much at stake here. a man s life, his reputation, his career, his family, the women, their credibility. the people of america having a justice sitting on the supreme court, the stakes are too high. i don t agree with republicans that you have to take a vote on friday, i don t agree with republicans that there shouldn t be a continuing background check. there s no reason not to have a background check. time should not be the determining factor when you are putting somebody on the supreme court for a life
14-year-old, or being taken advantage of, and it was again, these are women not even for money or lawsuits. no up side. if they only had something to lose. these women are coming from small communities. not movie stars. and it s not one. these are women going to the supermarket every day. some of their children are in school. real risks they re putting out. especially in a place like alabama. exactly. and against roy moore. not to take anything away, the actresses that came out were brave and brilliant and are our heroes. gwyneth paltrow has an oscar, a job a career and a lot of wealth. the victims in this story, and i m sure she would agree and most women took great risk. even for them it took 30 years. it is harder when you have nothing to gain, everything to lose. to see people on television say, oh, if true. it s true. or that happened a long time ago. even worse. michael, let me ask you this question. so we ve now had a president over the course of th
tonight. kelly, you do this for a living. we were the first person i thought of when i watched others on television say if we had only run the bag through a screen or put the customers through magnetometer, is that a fair assessment of security on sunday night in vegas? no, it s a reaction, a pretty predictable reaction. always this urge to answer the void, to answer the question. the problem is outlier incidents are really hard to plan for. ask yourself, if you were traveling with your family, you have a lot of bags, it took a long time to get somewhere, it may be in the 90 days or 120 days after the incident you might put up with waiting in line for 30 minutes waiting for your back to get through the desk, but after that would that be acceptable to you and what s the cost not only to the hotel chain but to everything, you have to have people who know what they re looking at, people trained for tsa to be able to look into a bag through an x-men machine.