and i believe said weirdly if i m president russia will never invade crimea. charley s op-ed i think was published in the hill was ill advised as dr. hill mentioned to congress. however, it was done publicly. it is based on my own reporting inleastpo incendiary rhetoric ud about then candidate trump given some of the comments he made not just about ukraine but nato e. i remember meeting with a foreign minister of nato member state in which then candidate trump came on television and that man said if that man is elected it s-the end of the west.ha someone criticized donald trump who is a candidate which donald trumphi and others have accused. and he did it openly.
impeachment inquiry focusing on the conduct of president trump. it could be they don t want to go down that road. the other thing is if you offer immunity to testify before congress, because it could preclude charges later on the southern district of new york and they may want that to get leverage on rudy giuliani, president trump or others. there may be very good reasons they re reluctant to deal with him. it did need a little unpacking. we thank you for your reporting and anal associate. thanks to both of you. coming up john bolton is back tweeting a back story. but democrats say.
efforts to obstruct and frankly american oversight and really the public at large owes them a debt of gratitude for work they do every day. i think we need completely illustrate what year talking about here. documents that members of congress, congressional committees investigating the president asked the state department for that were not turned over, you made freedom of information applications for and have receiveded now the first trunch of these documents. about 100 pages of documents that illustrate a connection between secretary of state pompeo to jewgiuliani involving ukraine. so you have got information that until now the state department and executive have been stonewalling congress. i should underscore that s not boss congress isn t try
most about this did not appear to testify. he said we ve made it abundantly clear to the president that their failure to can permit witnesses to testify and failure to c respond to subpoenas has oy built the case against them for obstruction of congress. mulvaney, giuliani, bolton. these people can tell you whether the president told them to do something. the president and others have made it clear he s willing to throw them under the bus. guarden sondland responded to being t threatened by throwing somebody else back.be this is assuming mr. giuliani and bolton would tell the truth before congress, which is in the case of mr. giuliani however, the case that this is a coup or witch hunt, this is the most preposterous statement of it all. the people who are going to impeach this president are
because the state department denied congressional efforts to turn over these documents. and a group of american citizens got it with the freedom of information application. and and my ears perked up is when he said we have dozens of these out there. so they may turn over more documents. once you start pealing back the curt cannen, all sorts of things come out and congress is going to be very interested in all of this. i think they re going to want to see eall these documents and have hearings and they may lead to new witness withes. whults rr so significant is remember what is going on in march. rudy and his henchman are trying to cook up all sorts of rumors to get rid of our anticorruption fighting ambassador muary yovanovitch in the in