advance our conversation from earlier in the evening. when you do look in the report one of the things ted wells highlights is inconsistency. one of them was that he didn t know one of the members of the equipment staff of the officiating examining crew and that indicates he did know that person. why is he telling ted wells he doesn t know one of the men involves, when thetects text messages show they did. that s how he ted chose to characterize it. and i guess ted just chose not to believe him and frankly, rachel the entire report virtually the entire report maybe with the exception of the
colts before the game. i m sorry to interrupt you but i believe my statement said that the way things happened prior to the game i said that it suggests it was more probable than not it could have been a sting operation and frankly what s your evidence? i think well, the evidence is in the report. ted wells laze out exactly all of the communication that happened between the colts and all the communication that happened between the league o official officials. none of those appear to be prior to the commencement of the game. did you advice tom brady about speaking out and if you did, why did you advice him in that way and if you didn t who did? i would like to answer your
and his body language and tone plays into that. i m not sure that we know that he lied but you have to look at today in the context of ted s findings that tom didn t cooperate. look he has defenses. he can deny it and say the report is nonconclusive. the league has responses to all of those things but i m not sure that we know that he lied. ted s finding was that it was probable. so what they should be doing is preparing themselves for presenting their defense. and the unfortunate reality is that the media clock ticks faster than the disciplinary talk. so what he says in the public has to be consistent with the position and what he s going to say in the room and the optatives today i don t think were that favorable for him. perfect segway into my next
section of the k balls, ted and the investigative team dheez consistently disbelieve testimony from patriots employees, tom, etc. and that was their choice. what was most frustrating to you guys that tom was telling them that they weren t believe sng. i will say the impression i had was from a schedule standpoint, tom s interview, i believe may have been the final interview in the entire investigative process and my own personal impression was that opinions may have already been slidified at that point and so that was a particular frust frustration to me. are you worried about your client s legacy? is he worried about it? there are lovers and haters