Further presentations. Lets address this question. The Division Circle site is some of what you are saying and it is sort of a yes and, supervisor ronen. From a design perspective, this is a site that is shared and im going to tap dr. Boren in a little bit who is also on the line to speak to some of the medical questions. Its a site that is being kind of jointly set up, not kind of. Is being jointly set up by hsa as responsible for mass care and shelter. The traditional shelter operator and the department of publichealth as the medical Behavioural Health provider for the city. I would prefer having a sight for people with covid19 and we no the capacity of the inq site that stan talked about is a challenge so, we want to make sure were maximizing every resource in the city. From the staffing operational staffing the site, they asked to find a provider who is willing and able to operate that site alongside the department of publichealth. Staff will be do the medical and Behavioural Healt
The auto prompts will look at callers entry. The questionandanswer time. But this is the Public Comment period. If you call in before Public Comment is called, youll be added to the queue. When you are called for Public Comment, please mute your device that you are listening to the meeting on, when it is your time to speak, youll be prompted to do so. Public comment during the meeting is limited to three minutes per speaker, unless otherwise established by the presiding officer of the meeting. Speakers are requested but not required to state their names. Sfgov tv, please show the office of Small Business. Today well start with the reminder that the Small Business commission official public is the official public forum to voice your opinions and concerns about policies that affect the Economic Vitality of Small Businesses in San Francisco. And that the office of Small Businesses is the best place to get answers about doing business in San Francisco during the local emergency. If you nee
[speaking foreign language]. Tenants are forced out of homes due to competition for Affordable Housing,s especially in soma. Developers need to wake up soma is not exclusive. Soma needs the housing. Lets support the jobs housing linkage fee. Thank you. Good afternoon. I am amanda representing the coalition on homelessness. We would like to voice support for updating the jobs housing lynx age fee linkage fee. It will ensure accountability to ending the housing crisis. We have the opportunity to generate 500 million over the next 10 years to allocate to constructing more Affordable Housing, preserving already Affordable Housing and building additional Supportive Housing. We urge you to stand up for housing justice in San Francisco. Thank you. Next speaker, please. I am susan. I am a 20 year resident of San Francisco and former nurse at San Francisco general. I have been running a Small Business for 15 years. I work with the coalition. I am here in support of this legislation. I think it
Hi, im the Community Housing Public Policy and i work with former Homeless People in support of. We provide a portal housing and help those residents residents achieve selfsufficiency. These update fees would generate 500 million towards 2,000 new units in ten years. 10 of those funds would go to the acquisition and preservation of existing Affordable Housing and 30 would go to building new Supportive Housing. Homeless people who are no longer needing supportive intervention also need next step housing that is deeply affordable to thrive once stabilized on the recovery path from homeless trauma. These kinds of fees have never been the determining factor in development. If we were truly to meet the Affordable Housing needs resulting from the Office Development, the cities own nexis study says we should be charging 193 per square foot. I think we are talking about 66 here, that is not enough. This is the fee Developers Pay to cover the fair share of housing the workers. From my perspecti
Costs up. Supervisor mandelman and how much do we think were saving by doing these projects . Well, the project is protected by code. When we install a new escalator, we have to protect them. If we dont, if were not able to get a contract awarded, it would be hard to get our wed have to get a variance to put our escalators in and wait to get the canopies constructed in the future, and im not sure we could get that variance. It really affects a lot of our projects here, so supervisor mandelman thank you. Chair fewer so i understand that the we have to have the canopies that were required to by code. But what exactly is required by code . Because what ive heard from you is theres a certain design element, the materials. What what is this exactly to code or is this going beyond what the code actually requires . The code requires we protect the investment. You can make a roof wider without the walls, so theres a certain angle required for the rainfall, so if your roof was wider, lets say,