executive. he seemed rather upset and it allowed him to say almost nothing to him. let me press you on why that might be. without being politically incorrect, may be just that technology isn t something a lot of them are fluid in. the language of technology, the use of technology and so maybe understanding how the technology was used against this country in 2016 was foreign for them. and again you ve started by taking us right to the heart of this, which is the cambridge analytica intersection and the possible cuclusion. where do those questions get answered? not at all. i didn t hear a clear answerer. there s an internal investigation. we should have said something sooner. i thought that was one area they started going down that road is why didn t you disclose but they
rupert stadler describes the elaine as the embodiment of their vision of autonomy is driving with level for the driver sits in the driver s seat as usual and presses the artificial intelligence button to switch over to autonomy is driving the invita . the second concept vehicle the icon takes it one step further for level five of autonomy is driving the designers have removed a few old standards. that a phone flies out as markovitch to points out that level five dispenses with the steering wheel and has an all new layout of the seats in front are first class and there s space in the rear lounge for two more passengers. another through the technical question as much as explains this technology isn t ready for volume production yet so the newest generation of the classic london taxi still requires human drivers anyway autonomy systems don t help lift the bank h. five at
systems. the question that we ve been failing to ask, all of us and our colleagues, have been failing to press the trump administration on, what are you doing? who was working on it? whose job is it? where is the special organization set up to make sure this doesn t happen in 2018 and 2020? to matt s point, the evidence suggests that voter fraud, at least in person voter fraud. there are very few instances. this is clearly a bigger problem but this may be one way to use the resources. let s think about the way they re conducted of we have questions about facebook. questions about this. i had a scary question. someone said can democracy survive the digital revolution? our own freedoms are being used against us here. we have to come one safeguards. but the constitution will make some of the safeguards very difficult. sure. a lot of this is a state issue. you want to see the states take a lead. technology isn t always for the
for these ideas. and i started thinking about stuff like waves which drivers use. they find the quickest route based on accumulation of user data. if go into wikipedia and plug in any word, anything shows up. if you putin jesse watters, wikipedia. don t do it. the point is kimberly: the controversy section. greg: technology isn t just a device..im it s the scope of it. it s the fact that everybody is contributing to it ande. that happens with wikipedia and waves and i get all these emails. there has got to be landing strip for ideas. we are trusting this huge problem to the government which is a dearth, it s a dearth of ideas. anyway, i m not the only one who has thought of that.nl dana: juan is, it salvageable for the republicans? juan: no, and it hasn t been for a very long time. as you pointed out, dana, seven years. seven years. you can go into the wikipedia. you can go on the internet and call up the experts.o the experts will say oh, we re republicans.l we re heritage.
page. there is no landing place for these ideas. and i started thinking about stuff like waves which drivers use. they find the quickest route based on accumulation of user data. go into wikipedia and plug in any word, anything shows up. if you put jesse watters, wikipedia. don t do it. the point is,. kimberly: the controversy section. greg: technology isn t just a device. it s the scope of it. it s the fact that everybody is contributing to it and happens with wikipedia and waves and i get all these emails. there has got to be landing strip for ideas. we are trusting this huge problem to the government which is adearth, it s a dearth of ideas. anyway, i m not the only one who has thought of that. im. dana: juan is, it salvageable for the republicans? juan: no, and it hasn t been for a very long time. as you pointed out, dana, seven years. you can go into the wikipedia. you can go on the internet and call up the experts. the experts will say oh, we re republicans.