Panel 42015. At panelists discussing last year for lessons. They will discuss future threats and best practices for the future in combating terrorism. This is live on cspan. [indiscernible] again, we are live this afternoon at the National Press club where the Potomac Institute is set to host a discussion on the global efforts to combat terrorism. The panelists are current and former ambassadors. While we wait for this, we will show you the latest in negotiations with iran on a nuclear deal. This is from this mornings washington journal. Host how close are we to a breakthrough and what needs to be negotiated in the final hours . Guest sure. They were going to shift the agreement from russia. It was a nice symbolic step, if nothing else, for the u. S. And others. Look, this deal is going outside of iran. It will increase the breakout time being able to make a nuclear weapon. It cannot be described as a dealbreaker it self. Sanctions have been the big sticking point. Can i have your atte
Bill must be approved by the house of lords. Heres a 90 minute portion of the debate. I beg to the death of marriage to samesex couples bill be read a second time. Mr. Speaker, you and i know that every marriage is different. Indeed any husband or wife is a member of this house is a very distinct set of challenges to face every day. [laughter] was marriage offers us all is a lifelong partner to share our journey, a loving, stable relationship to strength a nice and a mutual support throughout our lives. I believe this is something that should be embraced by more couples, feeling, love and commitment is no difference between samesex couples and opposite not couples. This enables society to recognize that commitment in the same way through marriage. Parliament should value people equally and a lot and enabling samesex couples to marry removes the current differentiation and distinction. Theres no single view on equal marriage from religious organization. Some are deeply opposed, others t
I supported the emergence of that new understanding and the Supreme Court made it the law of the land in the Helen Mcdonald decisions. In 2008 and 2010. Of that pair of decisions demolishes the slippery slope theory of those who oppose basically all firearms regulation on the view that once we permit any new firearms regulation at all, we will be inviting the government stepbystep to come ever closer to disarm the people. Leaving only the police and military with firearms. With heller and mcdonald on the books, Supreme Court in its own words took certain policy choices off the table. Thereby cleared the path a reasonable regulations to be enacted without fear that those policy choices would either open the door to unlimited government control, or be imperiled by exaggerated interpretation of the Second Amendment. As Justice Alito put in mcdonald, theres no longer any basis for such doomsday proclamations. Justice scalia speaking for the court and heller said at the end of his opinion.
Advance Market Analytics published a new research publication on “Insurance Big Data Analytics Market Insights, to 2027″ with 232 pages and enriched with self-explained Tables and charts in presentable format. In the Study you will find new evolving Trends, Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities generated […]