Rights in egypt . Again, i agree that it is not a coincidence. An opportunity in january of 2011 to have a discontinuation, to have a cut off point to say this was the have transparent and Accountable Government and lets at least the senior level of administration to see who needs to be transferred to maria trained and prosecuted or at least relieved from duty. Byre was at least an attempt the very first cabinet that came, that was appointed after mubaraks ouster, there was an attempt to have laws that would not have criminalized, not have ushered in prosecutions for past corruption, what did that socked , torevent future corruption really address the root causes of corruption like conflict of interest laws, more transparent and publicly accessible budget making postings and final outcome. The military council that was in power that came after mubarak had a vested interest in. Aintaining the mubarak state that is why we did not see a coherent prosecution strategy for past corruption an
Three days. Not only of what is happening in the white house and congress as well. Here is how you can call us host also on social media host some of the headlines reflecting what has been going on here over the past three days. Here is the wall street journal, their headline going to the Washington Post was quot ,d then the Washington Times reaction to last nights meeting , according to boehner, he sums it up this way they will not negotiate. To give us the latest we have and servesroll call as a staff writer. The meeting last night, what was actually accomplished and how did all the sites play out what happened last night . Guest well, good to be with you. Outgeneral sentiment coming of the meeting perhaps best summed up why Senate Minority leader Mitch Mcconnell of who appeared on the cnbc Program Shortly after the meeting. Cordial but unproductive. It went on a fairly long time. But as you just noted in the headlines, a fairly good summary of what seems to have gone on, that the re
Today. Reporter good morning. Its unclear what congress can accomplish today, but there will be meetings in the house to see if perhaps there could be a partial funding for just some different issues. One of those would be d. C. Government. Another issue regarding veterans. But its still unclear how thats going to go. Last night didnt go well between john boehner and the president. He says he feels the president is not willing to compromise when it comes to his Affordable Care act. The new Health Care Law that went into effect. Democrats say they are standing firm. We have divided government. Democrats control the white house and senate. Republicans control the house. We sent four different proposals to our colleagues. They rejected all of them. I can only conclude that they wanted to shut down government. I think that that has a purpose for them. We know what that is. They want to overturn the Affordable Care act. Its not going to happen. And frankly, thats not what our constitution h
Government shutdown, but more and more lawmakers are making another offer in the meantime. Danielle leigh joins us on capitol hill with that. Reporter good morning. So many federal workers arent getting paid so we. Ed to find out what are lawmakers while the shutdown continues. At least 108 of them have said they will go without pay as long as the shutdown continues. 56 republicans, 52 democrats and among those are five lawmakers from maryland and virginia. One is eric cantor is refusing pay. Also john delaney says hes going to donate his pay to charity. Tim kain is asking his salary be withheld. Now if youre wondering why with the shutdown wasnt their salary removed, they are paid by mandatory funds, not discretionary funds. Live in capitol hill, im danielle leigh, back to you. 4 32. Leaders at university of District Of Columbia is trying to come up with a contingency plan. They held an emergency meeting last night. They received federal funding. Its the only Public University in the
About that is that what is portrayed sometimes as being seeticized, what you really is the operation of different judicial philosophies at work. These are legitimate philosophies. They tend to drive them in a principled way towards answers to the same question. If you are able to perceive that a lot of times that is not the right way to aink about it erie it this is wellthoughtout philosophy about the law and the constitution, but they just dont have the same philosophy. This generates different results. You could say the same thing about the great battles in the Supreme Court over the new deal. There were philosophies about how you did interpret the constitution in certain areas. This generates some sharp differences. Times, the court was not just political in this sort of cents, how they align with political ideology, but they were actual politicians. Had one justice run for president and another former president , chief justice taft, appointed to the court. The first the first chief