in private meetings with him. he s impressive across a table with him but not so good when he stands at a podium. here is the case, though, i think for mitt romney. the guy is a turn-around artist. he has been successful at everything he has done in business. successful raining bane capital to create tens of thousands of jobs for new businesses and did awesome job running and turning around the salt lake city olympics. i make a case he helped turn around the massachusetts economy and budget situation. that is the case for mitt romney. he can turn around failing institutions. the u.s. government is failing. paul: but that hangs heavily, kim, on biography. if you listen to his speech, it said basically vote for me, i m mitt romney. i m a smart guy. i m a techno cat. he didn t use that word but that s the word i would use. he said i m experienced and so on. what about philosophy? what about vision? is biography enough? that is a problem. to the extent you see voters