elections and spying. again, tiktok disagrees. we will firewall protect the u.s. data from unwanted foreign access. tiktok will remain a place for free expression and will not be manipulated by any government. reporter: some suggest worries about tiktok are overblown. it poses about the same threat that companies like facebook and instagram and youtube and twitter pose. reporter: and free speech advocates see a big court battle brewing. the ban is compblatantly unconstitutional. it s an act of political theater. it is rooted in xenophobia. and it is trampling on the free speech rights of hundreds of thousands of people in montana. unless a court steps in montana s ban will go into effect next january, and it contains no provisions for punishing individual users, only companies providing access to tiktok. still, tech folks say enforcing
start-up just because it s cool and it in california does not mea that that business should be getting some sweet loan terms. maybe there s a reason no othe bank wanted to loan to them. i think it s fair to sa that any regional bank shoul have deposits guaranteed right now, if they were going under. and the problem that i was concerned about is that yo would then have all th deposits moved to the four top banks. this was not - this, for me, with about actua businesses that employed rea people that we re trying t make payroll and the potential that people were going to pull out deposits from a regional bank and give them to new york but, in fact, i think the president would have been more likely to act faster if this was a regional bank in ohio. part of the problem was that i was in silicon valley an people don t want to support tech folks because they thin they have done really well already. okay, but hold on a second. i get that companies need to make payroll how many small com
why do we need that? just because it s called a start-up, miss because it cool, and it s in california doesn t mean that business should get some loan terms maybe there s a reason no othe bank wanted to loan to them? i think it s fair to sa that any regional bank shoul have deposits guaranteed right now if they re going under the problem was that i was concerned about, is with the have all deposits move to th four top banks this to me was about actua businesses, that employed real people, they re trying to make payroll, and the potential t people were gonna pull i deposits from a regional bank, and give them to new york, i fact i think the president would ve been more likely to act faster, if this was regional bank in ohio. part of the problem was it was in silicon valley, and peopl don t want to support tech folks, because they thin they ve done really well okay, but hold on a, second now now how many small companies
the ears of the big tech folks they love bringing in the engineers from india and other countries. they ve been notoriously collaborating among themselves to do that are conspiring among themselves to do that . so again, this seems to be where the rift of the republican party is. is i it going to go more populit america first or go back to the bush-cheney days of old ? where is the party headed? i think the party is going to we re going to focus on securing our border. we re going to focus on legal immigration, zero illegal immigration and we re not going toimmi do anything that s goingo kill american jobs. that s where that s where the republicans are going toth > going. and the same on china where you re not going you guys aren t going to be pushing for the tpp or trans-pacific partnership or dropping the tariffs against china because i see a split in the party on that issue as well. so it gets frustrating. communist china is out stealing their jobs basically because the government o