Posted a message on social media stating that the heart of this democracy, our constitutional guarantee of secret ballots, is under a coordinated assault and siege. Within days after the election are, we witnessed an orchestrated effort to anoint the winner even while many key states were still being counted. The constitutional process must be allowed to continue. We are going to defend the honesty of the vote by insuring that every legal ballot is counted and that no illegal ballot is counted. This is not just with about honoring the votes of 74 million americans who voted for me, its about insuring that americans can have faith in this election and in all future elections. Lou were joined this evening by some of this countrys great americans who are fighting for President Trump, fighting for a free and Fair Election. One of them is dr. Linda lee tarver. Shes seen how the radical dems have worked to steal this election in the state the of michigan, how theyve worked to steal elections
Today, is additional worker safeguards to protect this workforce, to focus again always on preventive measures, to focus on helping support our employers. The governors plan includes expanding employer Education Resources and Protection Measures for workers who are sick or have been exposed to the virus. San jose has been added to a federal coronavirus watch list. Now, on that list, are cities from across the country. But leaders in the south bay say they didnt know this list didnt even exist the first place. Ann rubin joins us now live to explain why city and county officials arent sure what factors got them on that list. Still waiting to see what this all means. Reporter yeah, local leaders say they werent on the call when it was announced, nor have they heard from federal officials about, but still say they are concerned about cases on the way. The white housest he has a watch list on it, cities lagging behind in slowing the spread, among them san jose. Dr. Deborah birx, a Coronavir
Religion. In this country, it is not the department of judges, juries or government officials twere goveo decide who ought to teach catholic fifthgraders that jesus is the son of god or who ought to teach jewish preschoolers what it means to say here israel the lord your god and fun and that is what these cases are about is who controls and who teaches the faith. The answer is easy, churches misuse thoseth who teach their faith. Indeed it ispo one of the most important religious functions for any community. Passing the faith onto the next generation. With the churchs primary agents for teaching to fifthgraders teaching them for hours a week much more than parish priests, they fall within the exception of the community. Respondents would have the court ignorcourts ignore all that substituting the standard on first and foremost the title to determine whether the exception applies. That would elevate the form and force judges to decide what is religious enough to qualify and it would help
Of church and state means anything at all, it must mean the government cannot interfere with the churchs decisions about who is authorized to teach its religion. In this country, it is not the province of justice, juries or Government Official to decide who will teach catholic fifthgraders, or who want to teach Jewish School is what it means to say here, o israel, the lord is one. That is what these cases are about. Who controls who teaches the faith schoolchildren. The answer is easy. Churches must choose those who teach their faith. That is one of the most important religious functions for any religious community. Pass anaphase onto the next generation. Since it teachers with the church. Primary agents for teaching the catholic faith to fifthgraders, much more, they fall within the exception immunity. Less fondant would have accorded court ignore all that. Substituting a standard that relies on the title to determine whether there is an exception. That would wrongly elevate form over
Please the court, the separation of church and state means anything at all, it must mean the government cannot interfere with the churchs decisions about who is authorized to teach its religion. In this country, it is not the province of justice, juries or Government Official to decide who will teach catholic fifthgraders, or who want to teach Jewish School is what it means to say here, o israel, the lord is one. That is what these cases are about. Who controls who teaches the faith schoolchildren. The answer is easy. Churches must choose those who teach their faith. That is one of the most important religious functions for any religious community. Pass anaphase onto the next generation. Since it teachers with the church. Primary agents for teaching the catholic faith to fifthgraders, much more, they fall within the exception immunity. Less fondant would have accorded court ignore all that. Substituting a standard that relies on the title to determine whether there is an exception. Tha